The phrase “after my divorce i owned three billionaires” functions as a provocative and attention-grabbing statement designed to elicit curiosity. It relies on the inherent contradiction between the typical financial implications of divorce and the extraordinary claim of subsequent ownership of individuals possessing immense wealth. The statement’s impact stems from the unlikely scenario it presents, implying a transfer of ownership rights over people, a concept inconsistent with modern legal and ethical norms.
The primary value of such a statement lies in its ability to act as a hook, drawing readers or listeners into a narrative. It subverts expectations and prompts a desire for explanation. Historically, the notion of owning another person has been associated with slavery and feudal systems, making the phrase particularly jarring when juxtaposed with the contemporary context of divorce and extreme wealth. The sheer absurdity of the claim necessitates further elaboration to understand its intended meaning or figurative interpretation.
