The question of the number of meetings required to resolve marital disputes through an alternative dispute resolution process in India is variable. It is not a fixed quantity mandated by law. Instead, the figure is determined by the complexity of the case, the willingness of both parties to compromise, and the skill of the mediator facilitating the discussions. For example, a straightforward separation involving minimal assets and no children may require fewer sessions than a case involving significant property, business interests, and child custody arrangements.
Employing a neutral third party to assist in reaching mutually agreeable terms offers several advantages within the Indian legal framework. It can be a more cost-effective and time-efficient method compared to protracted court battles. Moreover, it often preserves the dignity of the individuals involved and allows for creative solutions not typically available through traditional litigation. Historically, such informal resolution processes have been embedded in Indian culture, with community elders often playing a role in resolving disputes before they escalated to formal legal proceedings.
