The question of whether a deficiency in emotional or physical closeness can legally justify the dissolution of a marriage is complex and varies significantly depending on jurisdiction. While not universally recognized as a direct cause for ending a marital union, it frequently contributes to underlying issues that are considered grounds. For example, consistent rejection of affection or deliberate emotional distance can escalate marital discord, potentially leading to accusations of abandonment, cruelty, or irreconcilable differences, which many courts recognize.
The significance of this element in marital stability has long been understood, even if formal legal recognition has evolved. Historically, marital duties often included expectations of companionship and mutual support, both emotional and physical. The breakdown of these expectations can deeply impact the well-being of individuals within the marriage. Modern legal frameworks increasingly acknowledge the importance of the emotional component of marriage, though direct cause-and-effect relationships are often difficult to prove definitively in court. The benefit of addressing this deficiency proactively through counseling or mediation is that it might prevent further marital breakdown, irrespective of legal recourse.