A fundamental distinction exists within the realm of marital dissolution, categorized primarily by the level of agreement between the parties involved. One path involves mutual consent on all key issues, while the other is characterized by active disagreement necessitating court intervention. For example, if both spouses concur on asset division, child custody, and spousal support, the process unfolds considerably different than if they hold opposing views on these matters.
Understanding this distinction is vital for several reasons. It directly impacts the time, cost, and emotional strain associated with the ending of a marriage. Historically, divorce proceedings were often inherently adversarial. However, a shift toward collaborative and less contentious methods has occurred, driven by a desire to minimize conflict and promote amicable resolutions, particularly when children are involved.