The question of whether mistreatment of a non-physical, psychological nature provides sufficient justification for marital dissolution according to scriptural principles is complex. It involves interpreting biblical texts related to marriage, abuse, and divorce within their historical and cultural contexts. Many understand spousal vows as encompassing a commitment to care, respect, and nurture, going beyond mere physical provision. When one spouse consistently undermines the other’s self-worth, manipulates their emotions, isolates them from support networks, or engages in other patterns of coercive control, the fundamental covenant of marriage is arguably violated.
Historically, interpretations of the Bible regarding divorce have varied considerably. Some traditions adopt a more literal reading, emphasizing specific grounds explicitly mentioned in scripture, such as adultery. Others adopt a broader interpretive lens, acknowledging that situations not explicitly addressed in the text may nonetheless represent a profound breach of the marital covenant, warranting consideration for separation. The potential benefits of acknowledging emotional abuse as a factor in divorce considerations include protecting vulnerable individuals from ongoing harm, validating their experiences, and allowing for a path toward healing and restoration. Moreover, recognizing such maltreatment can foster a more nuanced understanding of marital responsibilities within faith communities.
