The question of whether entering a subsequent marriage following the dissolution of a previous one constitutes a transgression of religious doctrine is a complex issue with varying interpretations across different faiths and denominations. Scriptural texts offer diverse perspectives, leading to ongoing debate and differing conclusions among religious scholars and adherents. These conclusions often hinge on specific interpretations of relevant passages and the weight given to factors such as the grounds for the initial divorce.
Historically, attitudes toward marriage dissolution and subsequent unions have shifted. Societal norms, legal frameworks, and evolving theological understandings have all influenced the permissibility and acceptance of second marriages. The availability of annulments, differing views on marital vows, and the presence or absence of children from the first marriage also contribute to the complexity. Furthermore, perspectives may be influenced by a desire to provide support and stability, particularly in cases involving hardship or abandonment.
The following sections will delve into specific religious perspectives, examining the range of interpretations, scriptural bases, and pastoral considerations surrounding this sensitive topic. The goal is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the diverse views and nuances associated with the question of marital status after divorce.
1. Scriptural Interpretation
The determination of whether remarriage after divorce constitutes a transgression rests heavily on the interpretation of specific scriptural passages. Divergent understandings of texts pertaining to marriage, divorce, and adultery directly influence conclusions regarding the permissibility of subsequent unions. For instance, interpretations of Jesus’s statements in the Gospels, specifically Matthew 19:9, where the exception clause “except for sexual immorality” is present, can fundamentally alter the perceived validity of a divorce and subsequent remarriage. A stricter interpretation might deem all remarriages after divorce as adulterous, while a more lenient view might permit remarriage in instances where the original divorce was justified by the exception clause. Therefore, the chosen interpretative lens acts as a primary cause in establishing whether a specific action aligns with or violates perceived divine law.
The significance of scriptural interpretation lies in its capacity to shape individual beliefs and denominational doctrines. Real-life examples abound, with differing church denominations holding contrasting stances on remarriage. Some denominations, adhering to a more literal interpretation of scripture, prohibit remarriage under nearly all circumstances, emphasizing the permanence of the marriage covenant. Conversely, other denominations adopt a contextual approach, considering the circumstances surrounding the divorce, such as abuse or abandonment, and permitting remarriage as a compassionate response to human suffering. This practical variance demonstrates the profound impact of scriptural understanding on the lived experiences of individuals navigating marital breakdown and the potential for future relationships.
In summary, the understanding of relevant scriptural passages forms the bedrock of any position on the issue. Challenges arise from inherent ambiguities within the texts, the need to reconcile potentially conflicting verses, and the subjectivity involved in applying ancient teachings to modern contexts. Recognizing the pivotal role of interpretation allows for a more nuanced and informed consideration of the broader theological and ethical considerations surrounding marital dissolution and the possibility of remarriage. This understanding connects directly to the overall assessment of marital status after divorce.
2. Divorce Grounds
The specific justification for the termination of a marriage, commonly referred to as divorce grounds, significantly impacts the religious assessment of subsequent remarriage. The perceived validity of the initial divorce directly influences the permissibility of entering a new marital union, according to various theological viewpoints. The grounds upon which a divorce is granted are therefore pivotal in determining whether remarriage is considered acceptable, a transgression, or a matter requiring repentance and reconciliation.
-
Adultery as Justification
Adultery often serves as a primary justification for divorce within many religious frameworks. Scriptural interpretations frequently view infidelity as a breach of the marital covenant, thereby releasing the innocent spouse from their marital obligations. In such cases, remarriage for the innocent party is sometimes permitted, as the original marriage is considered to have been irrevocably broken by the adulterous act. However, even when adultery is proven, differing theological perspectives exist regarding whether the guilty party is ever permitted to remarry.
-
Abandonment and Desertion
The abandonment or desertion of a spouse can also constitute valid grounds for divorce. This situation arises when one partner intentionally and permanently leaves the marital home, severing all ties and responsibilities. Religious perspectives on remarriage following abandonment vary, with some denominations permitting remarriage after a specified period of abandonment has elapsed, viewing the desertion as a de facto dissolution of the marital bond. Other denominations may require attempts at reconciliation before permitting remarriage.
-
Abuse and Endangerment
Physical, emotional, or psychological abuse that endangers the well-being of a spouse or children presents another complex scenario. When abuse is substantiated, many religious leaders and denominations advocate for the safety and protection of the abused party, often supporting divorce as a necessary measure. In these instances, remarriage may be viewed as permissible for the abused individual, as the original marriage is deemed to have been violated in a fundamental way that undermines its sacred nature. The focus shifts to providing safety and the opportunity for a healthy, non-abusive relationship.
-
Lack of Religious or Scriptural Basis
Some divorces occur for reasons that are not specifically addressed in scripture or religious law. These may include irreconcilable differences, incompatibility, or a general breakdown of the marital relationship without any specific fault being attributable to either party. In such instances, the permissibility of remarriage becomes more ambiguous. Many religious traditions are less inclined to permit remarriage following a divorce based on secular or non-scriptural grounds, emphasizing the sanctity of marriage and discouraging dissolution for reasons deemed insufficient.
In summary, the grounds for divorce directly influence religious attitudes toward remarriage. When a divorce is deemed valid based on scriptural interpretations and specific circumstances, such as adultery, abandonment, or abuse, remarriage may be viewed as permissible, particularly for the innocent party. Conversely, divorces based on less compelling or non-scriptural reasons often lead to stricter prohibitions or restrictions on remarriage, reflecting the enduring emphasis on the permanence and sanctity of marriage within many religious traditions. This interrelation reflects various perspectives on marital status after divorce.
3. Adultery’s Impact
Adultery exerts a profound influence on the permissibility of remarriage after divorce within numerous religious doctrines. It is frequently regarded as a fundamental breach of the marital covenant, often cited as a primary justification for dissolving the original union. The impact of infidelity extends beyond the immediate betrayal, shaping subsequent considerations regarding the spiritual and ethical implications of remarriage. Specifically, the question of whether remarriage following a divorce precipitated by adultery constitutes a sin is often directly linked to the perceived culpability and the application of divine forgiveness. For example, interpretations of biblical texts frequently allow the innocent party in a divorce caused by adultery to remarry, deeming the initial marital bond irreparably broken by the adulterous act. However, the permissibility of remarriage for the adulterous party is often subject to stricter scrutiny and may require demonstrable repentance and atonement.
The determination of adultery’s impact is further complicated by varying definitions and interpretations of the term itself. While physical infidelity is typically considered a clear violation, emotional affairs or persistent unfaithfulness may also be viewed as adulterous by some religious traditions. Furthermore, the specific circumstances surrounding the adultery, such as whether it was a single isolated incident or a pattern of behavior, can influence the severity of its perceived impact on the marriage. Real-world scenarios demonstrate this complexity. A couple divorcing after a long-term affair might face different religious judgments regarding remarriage than a couple divorcing after a single instance of infidelity, particularly if one party demonstrates genuine remorse and seeks reconciliation.
In conclusion, the act of adultery stands as a significant determinant in assessing the ethical and spiritual implications of remarriage following divorce. Its impact varies depending on religious interpretations, the specific nature of the infidelity, and the level of repentance displayed by the involved parties. The consideration of adultery’s role is central to understanding the diverse perspectives surrounding remarriage and its potential classification as a transgression within different faith traditions. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of adultery’s impact is crucial for navigating the complexities of marital status after divorce and its related theological considerations.
4. Forgiveness Doctrine
The doctrine of forgiveness directly influences perspectives on remarriage following divorce, particularly when assessing whether such remarriage constitutes a sin. Forgiveness, as a core tenet in many religions, offers a pathway to reconciliation and restoration for individuals who have transgressed. The application of forgiveness principles to divorce and remarriage scenarios often hinges on factors such as repentance, atonement, and the nature of the original offense leading to the marital dissolution. A central question revolves around whether divine or communal forgiveness absolves individuals from the perceived sin of remarriage, especially when prior transgressions contributed to the divorce.
The significance of forgiveness as a component lies in its potential to mitigate the perceived severity of remarriage after divorce. For example, in cases where individuals have genuinely repented for their roles in a failed marriage, forgiveness can provide a framework for acceptance and integration into the religious community. Real-life examples include instances where individuals participate in reconciliation ceremonies, seek pastoral counseling, and demonstrate a commitment to a new, healthy relationship. The granting of forgiveness, whether through a formal religious process or informal communal acceptance, can reshape perceptions of the remarriage from a sinful act to a renewed opportunity for love and commitment within a framework of spiritual growth. Practical applications of this understanding often involve pastoral guidance tailored to individual circumstances, emphasizing the possibility of redemption and a future free from the burdens of past mistakes.
In summary, the doctrine of forgiveness functions as a crucial lens through which remarriage after divorce is evaluated. Challenges remain in determining the authenticity of repentance and the appropriate application of forgiveness principles in complex marital situations. The connection between forgiveness and remarriage underscores the tension between upholding religious ideals of marital permanence and extending compassion to individuals seeking a second chance. Ultimately, the role of forgiveness highlights the broader theme of balancing justice and mercy within the context of religious belief and practice. This understanding is vital for comprehending diverse religious views on marital status after divorce.
5. Remarriage Vows
The act of taking remarriage vows presents a unique theological consideration when evaluating the question of whether remarriage following divorce constitutes a sin. The promises made during a second marriage ceremony are often viewed through the lens of prior marital commitments and the circumstances surrounding the initial divorce. The sincerity, intent, and theological consistency of these vows are crucial factors in determining their validity and potential impact on the perceived righteousness of the remarriage.
-
Continuity of Covenant Theology
Remarriage vows exist within a larger framework of covenant theology. Some religious traditions view marriage as a sacred covenant between two individuals and, more significantly, between the individuals and God. If the initial covenant is perceived as unbroken, even after a civil divorce, taking remarriage vows could be seen as violating the original sacred commitment. This perspective often results in a prohibition against remarriage unless the initial marriage is considered nullified by specific circumstances such as adultery or abandonment. The essence of this view is that the first vows remain binding, impacting the legitimacy of any subsequent promises.
-
Intention and Sincerity
The intention and sincerity behind remarriage vows are critical in assessing their moral weight. If the individuals entering the second marriage do so with a genuine desire to honor God, commit to fidelity, and build a loving and supportive relationship, the act may be viewed more favorably. Conversely, if the vows are taken lightly or without a full understanding of their implications, the moral standing may be questioned. Consider the instance of an individual who demonstrates repentance for past marital failures and approaches remarriage with humility and a commitment to learning from previous mistakes. The perceived sincerity can influence the assessment of the vows’ spiritual validity.
-
Consistency with Prior Marital Status
The consistency of remarriage vows with the prior marital status significantly influences the perception of their validity. If the previous marriage ended due to scripturally permissible reasons, such as adultery on the part of the former spouse, the new vows might be viewed as legitimate and morally sound. However, if the previous marriage ended without such justification, taking vows of lifelong commitment to a new partner may be perceived as conflicting with the initial marital promise. The compatibility of these vows with prior marital events influences their spiritual implications.
-
Pastoral Counsel and Guidance
Pastoral counsel often plays a vital role in the context of remarriage vows. Religious leaders may provide guidance and support to individuals considering remarriage, helping them understand the theological implications of their decision and prepare for the commitments they are about to make. The involvement of clergy in this process can lend legitimacy to the vows, ensuring that they are taken with a full understanding of their significance within the religious framework. The support and endorsement of a religious authority can also influence the community’s perception of the remarriage’s spiritual validity.
In conclusion, the taking of remarriage vows carries complex implications within the context of whether remarriage after divorce constitutes a sin. These implications are heavily influenced by the theological perspectives on the permanence of marriage, the circumstances surrounding the initial divorce, the sincerity of the individuals involved, and the guidance of religious authorities. Each of these facets intertwines to shape the moral and spiritual assessment of remarriage vows and their relationship to the overarching question of marital status following divorce.
6. Pastoral Guidance
Pastoral guidance constitutes a critical element in navigating the complex theological and emotional terrain surrounding remarriage after divorce. The question of whether such remarriage constitutes a sin often necessitates individualized assessment, considering specific circumstances, scriptural interpretations, and the overall spiritual well-being of those involved. Pastors and religious counselors provide a vital service by offering informed perspectives, facilitating thoughtful reflection, and assisting individuals in aligning their decisions with their faith’s teachings and personal values. Pastoral involvement is therefore not merely advisory, but a crucial component in the decision-making process, influencing both the individual’s understanding and the community’s perception.
The practical application of pastoral guidance includes facilitating open and honest dialogue about the reasons for the initial divorce, the emotional impact on all parties involved, and the potential challenges and opportunities presented by remarriage. For example, a pastor might work with a couple seeking remarriage to explore their understanding of marital vows, their commitment to fidelity, and their readiness to address potential conflicts constructively. In cases where the initial divorce involved adultery or abuse, the pastor may offer specific counseling focused on repentance, forgiveness, and the establishment of healthy relationship patterns. Pastoral guidance extends beyond individual counseling, often involving premarital education, conflict resolution strategies, and ongoing support to ensure the long-term success and spiritual harmony of the new marriage.
In conclusion, pastoral guidance plays a pivotal role in shaping the understanding and acceptance of remarriage after divorce. By providing informed perspectives, facilitating self-reflection, and offering practical support, pastors assist individuals in navigating the complexities of faith and relationships. Challenges remain in balancing adherence to religious doctrine with compassionate understanding of individual circumstances. Ultimately, effective pastoral guidance helps individuals make informed decisions aligned with their values and promotes healing and reconciliation within the broader faith community, contributing significantly to the ethical and spiritual dimensions of marital status after divorce.
7. Denominational Variance
Denominational variance directly impacts the perception of remarriage following divorce. Diverse religious denominations hold differing interpretations of scripture and theological doctrines, leading to a spectrum of views on whether remarriage constitutes a sin. This variance manifests in specific regulations, pastoral guidelines, and community attitudes, profoundly affecting individuals’ experiences and choices within each denomination. The importance of denominational variance stems from its power to shape moral judgments and influence individuals’ spiritual well-being, offering differing pathways and sanctions regarding marital dissolution and subsequent unions. For instance, some denominations strictly prohibit remarriage under almost all circumstances, adhering to a literal interpretation of scriptural passages emphasizing the permanence of marriage. Conversely, others permit remarriage in specific situations, such as adultery or abandonment, or after a period of repentance and reconciliation, viewing these circumstances as mitigating factors.
Practical examples underscore the significance of denominational variance. A Catholic individual, for example, seeking remarriage after divorce may face considerable obstacles unless the first marriage is annulled, a process that can be lengthy and complex. In contrast, a member of a more liberal Protestant denomination may find greater acceptance and support for remarriage, particularly if the divorce occurred due to infidelity or abuse. These differing approaches directly impact individuals’ access to sacraments, leadership roles within the church, and social acceptance within the religious community. Furthermore, the availability and nature of pastoral counseling vary widely across denominations, affecting the level of support and guidance individuals receive when navigating marital challenges and considering remarriage. The emphasis on forgiveness, repentance, and the possibility of a “clean slate” also differs considerably, reflecting diverse theological underpinnings.
In summary, denominational variance is a critical component in assessing the issue of remarriage following divorce. Challenges arise from reconciling these diverse perspectives and promoting understanding and respect across denominational lines. Recognizing the impact of denominational affiliation allows for a more nuanced approach to the topic, acknowledging that judgments regarding the morality of remarriage are often contingent upon specific theological frameworks and community norms. Understanding denominational variance is essential for anyone seeking to comprehend the multifaceted nature of religious perspectives on marital status after divorce.
8. Social Context
The social context significantly shapes perceptions of whether remarriage following divorce constitutes a transgression. Societal norms, cultural values, and evolving attitudes toward marriage and divorce directly influence religious interpretations and individual beliefs. In societies where divorce is stigmatized, remarriage may be viewed more negatively, potentially reinforcing religious doctrines that discourage or prohibit it. Conversely, in cultures where divorce is more accepted, religious views may adapt to reflect changing social realities, leading to more lenient interpretations and greater acceptance of remarriage.
The influence of social context is evident in varying attitudes toward remarriage across different geographical regions and cultural groups. For example, in some traditionally conservative societies, remarriage, especially for women, may face significant social disapproval, regardless of religious affiliation. This disapproval can stem from cultural norms prioritizing marital permanence or concerns about family honor. Conversely, in more secular or individualistic societies, remarriage may be viewed as a personal choice, with less emphasis on religious prohibitions. This shift in social attitudes can prompt religious institutions to re-evaluate their stances and offer more compassionate guidance to individuals considering remarriage. Furthermore, the rise of blended families and changing family structures necessitate a re-examination of traditional views on marriage and divorce, reflecting a broader societal shift toward greater inclusivity and acceptance of diverse family arrangements.
Understanding the interplay between social context and religious beliefs is crucial for comprehending the complexities of remarriage after divorce. Challenges arise in reconciling traditional religious doctrines with evolving social norms and individual rights. Acknowledging the influence of social context allows for a more nuanced and empathetic approach to the topic, recognizing that perceptions of remarriage are shaped by a multitude of factors beyond purely religious considerations. Ultimately, the ongoing dialogue between religious institutions and society will continue to shape attitudes toward marriage, divorce, and remarriage, reflecting the dynamic interplay between faith and culture.
9. Old Testament Law
The legal framework of the Old Testament provides foundational texts that are frequently referenced in discussions concerning the permissibility of remarriage following divorce. These ancient laws offer insights into marital expectations, grounds for divorce, and societal norms that continue to inform theological debates on this complex subject. Examination of these texts reveals nuanced perspectives that require careful interpretation within their historical and cultural context.
-
Deuteronomy 24:1-4 and Subsequent Marriage
Deuteronomy 24:1-4 addresses a scenario where a divorced woman remarries and is later divorced again, or her second husband dies. This passage prohibits the first husband from remarrying her. While this does not explicitly address the permissibility of remarriage in general, some interpret it to suggest that divorce and remarriage are acknowledged realities, even if not explicitly encouraged. This passage’s existence within Old Testament Law implies an acceptance of remarriage under certain circumstances, influencing discussions of whether remarriage inherently constitutes a sin.
-
Grounds for Divorce in Old Testament Law
The Old Testament does not provide an exhaustive list of permissible grounds for divorce, leaving room for interpretive differences. Some scholars argue that the phrase “some uncleanness” (Deuteronomy 24:1) could encompass a wide range of marital offenses, potentially justifying divorce and subsequent remarriage. Others maintain a more restrictive view, limiting acceptable grounds to severe transgressions like adultery. The interpretation of these permissible grounds directly impacts the assessment of remarriage; if the initial divorce was justified under Old Testament Law, remarriage may be viewed as permissible.
-
Emphasis on Marital Fidelity
The Old Testament strongly emphasizes marital fidelity, particularly through the prohibition of adultery in the Ten Commandments (Exodus 20:14). Adultery is often viewed as a violation of the marital covenant, potentially nullifying the marriage bond. While the Old Testament does not explicitly address whether remarriage is permissible after a divorce resulting from adultery, some interpret this emphasis on fidelity to suggest that the innocent party in such a divorce is free to remarry, as the original covenant has been broken by the adulterous spouse. This perspective influences theological arguments concerning the sinfulness of remarriage.
-
Patriarchal Context and Women’s Rights
Old Testament Law operates within a patriarchal social structure, where women’s rights were limited. Divorce and remarriage often had different implications for men and women. While men generally had greater freedom to initiate divorce and remarry, women faced greater social and economic vulnerability. Some argue that interpretations of Old Testament Law regarding remarriage must consider this power imbalance, ensuring that women are not unjustly penalized for seeking remarriage after being divorced. This recognition of historical context informs contemporary discussions about fairness and justice in relation to remarriage.
The various facets of Old Testament Law offer complex and sometimes conflicting perspectives on remarriage following divorce. While some passages suggest an acceptance of remarriage under certain circumstances, others emphasize the importance of marital fidelity and the potential disruption caused by divorce. The ongoing theological debate regarding the morality of remarriage relies heavily on these foundational texts, requiring careful consideration of their historical context and nuanced interpretations.
Frequently Asked Questions
The following questions address common inquiries and misconceptions regarding the complex issue of remarriage after divorce, particularly concerning its potential classification as a transgression within various religious and ethical frameworks.
Question 1: Does the Bible explicitly prohibit remarriage after divorce?
Scriptural interpretations vary. Some interpretations emphasize the permanence of marriage, suggesting that divorce, and therefore remarriage, is generally prohibited. Others focus on specific exceptions, such as adultery, which may justify divorce and permit remarriage for the innocent party.
Question 2: What is the significance of the “exception clause” in Matthew 19:9 regarding remarriage?
The phrase “except for sexual immorality” (often termed the “exception clause”) in Matthew 19:9 is a focal point of debate. Some interpretations assert that this clause provides a valid exception to the general prohibition against divorce and remarriage, specifically when infidelity has occurred.
Question 3: How do different Christian denominations view remarriage after divorce?
Christian denominations hold diverse perspectives. Some denominations, such as certain branches of Catholicism and some conservative Protestant groups, maintain a strict stance against remarriage unless the first marriage is annulled or deemed invalid. Other denominations adopt more lenient approaches, considering factors like repentance, forgiveness, and the circumstances surrounding the divorce.
Question 4: Is repentance a factor in determining the permissibility of remarriage following divorce?
In many religious traditions, repentance is considered a significant factor. Genuine remorse for any role in the failure of the initial marriage may be viewed as a mitigating circumstance, potentially opening the door to forgiveness and the possibility of remarriage.
Question 5: What role does pastoral counseling play in decisions about remarriage after divorce?
Pastoral counseling provides guidance, support, and theological perspectives to individuals contemplating remarriage. Pastors may assist in navigating complex emotions, interpreting scripture, and aligning decisions with personal values and religious teachings.
Question 6: Does the Old Testament offer any insights into the question of remarriage after divorce?
The Old Testament provides legal and societal contexts that inform discussions on remarriage. While some passages suggest an acknowledgment of divorce and remarriage, others emphasize the importance of marital fidelity. Interpretation of these texts contributes to the ongoing debate.
Understanding the varied perspectives and theological nuances is crucial when considering the complexities surrounding this issue. Individual circumstances, scriptural interpretations, and denominational teachings all contribute to the ultimate determination.
The subsequent section will explore specific case studies and real-life scenarios to further illustrate the practical implications of these theological considerations.
Navigating the Complexities of Remarriage After Divorce
The question of whether remarriage following divorce constitutes a sin elicits diverse viewpoints across religious and ethical frameworks. Navigating this intricate terrain necessitates careful consideration of multiple factors.
Tip 1: Thoroughly Examine Scriptural Interpretations: A comprehensive understanding of relevant scriptural passages is essential. Explore varying interpretations and consider the historical and cultural context of the texts.
Tip 2: Evaluate the Grounds for the Initial Divorce: The validity of the divorce according to religious doctrine significantly influences the permissibility of remarriage. Determine whether the grounds align with scriptural allowances.
Tip 3: Acknowledge the Impact of Adultery: Assess whether adultery contributed to the divorce and its implications. Infidelity often carries significant weight in determining the acceptability of subsequent marriage.
Tip 4: Consider the Doctrine of Forgiveness: Investigate the role of forgiveness within a specific religious framework. Genuine repentance and reconciliation may impact the assessment of remarriage.
Tip 5: Seek Pastoral Guidance: Consult with religious leaders or counselors to gain informed perspectives and personalized guidance. Pastoral counseling can provide invaluable support in navigating complex theological and emotional aspects.
Tip 6: Recognize Denominational Variance: Acknowledge the diverse stances held by different religious denominations. Understand that permissible practices and beliefs vary significantly depending on denominational affiliation.
Tip 7: Understand the Social Context: Recognize the influence of societal norms and cultural values on perceptions of remarriage. Social acceptance or disapproval can significantly impact individual beliefs and community attitudes.
Navigating this complex issue requires careful reflection, honest self-assessment, and informed decision-making. A thorough understanding of the aforementioned factors enables a more nuanced and responsible approach.
The preceding exploration provides foundational knowledge for continued deliberation on this complex topic. Further research into specific case studies and ethical dilemmas is recommended.
Conclusion
Whether remarriage after divorce constitutes a sin remains a subject of ongoing debate and divergent interpretation within various religious traditions. The preceding exploration has illuminated the complex interplay of scriptural analysis, denominational doctrines, social contexts, and individual circumstances that shape diverse perspectives on this issue. Considerations such as the validity of the initial divorce, the presence of adultery, the role of repentance, and the influence of pastoral guidance contribute to the nuanced landscape of beliefs surrounding remarriage.
Given the multifaceted nature of the question, individuals must engage in careful reflection, informed by both religious teachings and personal values, when contemplating remarriage following divorce. A thorough understanding of relevant theological frameworks and the potential impact on one’s spiritual well-being is paramount. Further research and dialogue with religious leaders are encouraged to facilitate responsible decision-making and promote a compassionate understanding of differing viewpoints within the broader community.
