Pennsylvania law does not explicitly address pet custody or visitation in divorce proceedings. Consequently, domestic animals are generally considered personal property. This classification means that, upon dissolution of marriage, determinations regarding their care and possession are treated similarly to the division of other assets, such as furniture or vehicles. An example would be a judge awarding ownership of a dog to one party based on factors like who purchased the animal or who provides primary care.
The growing emotional significance attached to companion animals has led to increased interest in more nuanced legal approaches. While pets are legally classified as property, their role as family members generates considerable emotional investment. Historically, disputes were resolved solely through property division principles. However, acknowledging the bond between humans and animals is becoming more prevalent, prompting some legal professionals and advocacy groups to push for legislative reforms or judicial interpretations that consider the animal’s well-being and the existing relationships.
