Transferring ownership of a home into a trust prior to dissolution of marriage proceedings raises significant legal considerations. This action involves conveying the property from individual or joint ownership to a separate legal entity, the trust. The timing of such a transfer, specifically its proximity to the commencement of divorce proceedings, is crucial in determining its potential ramifications.
The motivations behind establishing a trust before a divorce can vary. Some individuals may seek to protect assets from potential division in a divorce settlement. Others may have estate planning goals independent of the impending divorce, such as providing for children from a previous relationship or managing assets in the event of incapacity. The historical context of asset protection strategies in divorce cases reveals a long-standing tension between individual financial planning and the equitable distribution principles of family law.
This discussion will examine the legal implications of placing a residence into a trust when a divorce is anticipated or underway. Key areas to be addressed include fraudulent transfer laws, the court’s authority to classify and value trust assets, and the potential for the trust to be disregarded or modified during the divorce process.
1. Timing of the transfer
The temporal aspect of transferring a house into a trust relative to the initiation of divorce proceedings is paramount. The closer the transfer is to the filing of divorce papers, the greater the scrutiny it will receive from the court. A transfer executed well in advance of any marital discord is less likely to be viewed with suspicion compared to one occurring immediately before or during the divorce process. The transfer’s timing can significantly influence whether the court perceives the action as a legitimate estate planning strategy or an attempt to defraud the other spouse of marital assets.
Consider a scenario where a homeowner establishes an irrevocable trust five years prior to any marital issues arising, with the stated purpose of long-term estate planning for their children. In contrast, imagine another individual who, upon learning of their spouse’s intent to file for divorce, quickly transfers their jointly owned home into a newly created trust. The former is more likely to be upheld, while the latter faces a high probability of being deemed a fraudulent conveyance. Courts often analyze the circumstances surrounding the transfer, including the motivation behind it, to determine its validity. If the timing suggests an intent to hide assets or deprive the spouse of their rightful share, the court possesses the power to set aside the transfer or include the house as a marital asset subject to division.
In summary, the timing of transferring a house into a trust before a divorce is a critical factor influencing the legal ramifications. Transfers made in close proximity to divorce proceedings are subject to heightened scrutiny and are more likely to be challenged as attempts to circumvent equitable distribution laws. Understanding this temporal element is essential for anyone considering such a transfer, emphasizing the need for careful planning and legal counsel to avoid potential pitfalls.
2. Fraudulent conveyance concerns
When contemplating the transfer of a house into a trust prior to divorce, the specter of fraudulent conveyance looms large. Fraudulent conveyance, also known as fraudulent transfer, refers to actions taken by an individual to move assets beyond the reach of creditors or, in the context of divorce, a spouse. The legal framework surrounding divorce seeks to ensure an equitable division of marital property. Actions that undermine this principle, such as transferring a significant asset like a house into a trust with the intent to shield it from division, can be deemed fraudulent.
The court examines several factors to determine whether a transfer constitutes a fraudulent conveyance. These include the timing of the transfer, the solvency of the transferor (the person placing the house in the trust) after the transfer, whether fair consideration was received (e.g., was the house sold at market value to the trust?), and the relationship between the transferor and the trustee (the person managing the trust). For instance, if an individual transfers a house into a trust managed by their sibling shortly before filing for divorce, and receives no payment for the transfer, the court will likely view this arrangement with skepticism. Conversely, a transfer to an independent third-party trustee for fair market value might be viewed as a legitimate transaction, though still subject to scrutiny. The consequences of a finding of fraudulent conveyance can be severe, potentially leading to the trust being disregarded, the property being included in the marital estate, and even sanctions against the transferor.
In conclusion, understanding the potential for fraudulent conveyance claims is critical when considering placing a home into a trust before divorce. The intent behind the transfer, the timing relative to the divorce proceedings, and the details of the transaction are all relevant to a court’s determination. Seeking legal advice from an experienced attorney is essential to ensure compliance with relevant laws and to minimize the risk of adverse consequences related to fraudulent conveyance claims. The desire to protect assets must be balanced against the legal requirements for fair and transparent dealings within the context of divorce.
3. Marital asset classification
The classification of property as either marital or separate is a cornerstone of divorce proceedings, directly impacting asset division. When the question arises regarding placing a home into a trust before divorce, this classification becomes intricately intertwined. If the house is deemed a marital asset, meaning it was acquired during the marriage using marital funds or through the efforts of either spouse, it is typically subject to equitable distribution. Transferring such an asset into a trust, even if seemingly removing it from individual ownership, does not automatically shield it from consideration in the divorce. The court retains the authority to examine the circumstances surrounding the transfer and determine whether the trust effectively alters the asset’s marital character.
Consider a scenario where a couple jointly purchases a house during their marriage, and subsequently, one spouse transfers the property into a trust solely benefiting themselves. Despite the transfer, the court may still classify the house as a marital asset, particularly if the transfer occurred shortly before the divorce filing or if marital funds were used to maintain the property after the transfer. Conversely, if the house was owned by one spouse prior to the marriage and remains titled solely in their name throughout the marriage, it is more likely to be classified as separate property. However, even separate property can become commingled with marital assets or increase in value due to marital efforts, potentially subjecting a portion of its value to division. The establishment of a trust for separate property before divorce, in such a case, could solidify its status as separate, but requires careful documentation and adherence to legal formalities.
In conclusion, understanding marital asset classification is crucial when considering a pre-divorce transfer of a home into a trust. While a trust can serve legitimate estate planning purposes, it cannot be used as a tool to fraudulently recharacterize marital assets as separate. The court’s primary focus is on equitable distribution, and it will scrutinize any transfers that appear designed to circumvent this principle. Therefore, individuals contemplating such a move must seek legal counsel to assess the classification of the property and to ensure that the transfer aligns with relevant legal standards, or face the consequences of the trust being disregarded or modified during the divorce process.
4. Court’s power over trusts
The authority of the court in divorce proceedings extends to trusts, particularly when a house has been placed within one prior to the dissolution of marriage. This jurisdiction is paramount in preventing the misuse of trusts to shield marital assets unfairly. The court’s power encompasses the ability to examine the trust’s creation, funding, and operation to determine if it was established with the intent to defraud the other spouse or circumvent equitable distribution laws. For instance, if a party transfers a house, a significant marital asset, into a trust shortly before or during divorce proceedings, the court can scrutinize the transfer to ascertain its validity. If the court finds that the trust was created primarily to hide the asset from the marital estate, it can disregard the trust, order its modification, or include the house in the property division as if the trust did not exist.
The court’s intervention can manifest in various ways. It might order the trustee to provide a full accounting of the trust’s assets and transactions. It can compel the trustee to testify regarding the trust’s purpose and origin. Ultimately, the court possesses the authority to reclassify assets held in the trust as marital property, thereby subjecting them to division between the divorcing parties. A real-world example involves a case where a husband placed the family home into an irrevocable trust for the benefit of his children from a prior marriage, just months before his wife filed for divorce. The court, upon investigation, determined that the timing and circumstances of the transfer indicated an intent to deprive the wife of her equitable share of the marital estate. Consequently, the court ruled that the house was a marital asset and subject to division, effectively nullifying the intended asset protection strategy.
In conclusion, the court’s power over trusts is a critical component in divorce cases where a house has been transferred into a trust before the proceedings. This power ensures fairness and prevents parties from using trusts as tools for asset concealment. Understanding the court’s reach is essential for anyone considering such a transfer, as the timing, intent, and validity of the trust will be rigorously examined to ensure equitable distribution of marital property. Engaging qualified legal counsel is paramount to navigate these complex issues and to understand the potential ramifications of asset transfers involving trusts in the context of divorce.
5. Trust terms and provisions
The specific language and clauses within a trust document play a pivotal role in determining the effectiveness and legal standing of transferring a house into said trust prior to divorce. These provisions dictate the trustee’s powers, the beneficiaries’ rights, and the overall purpose of the trust. When a divorce is anticipated, courts will meticulously examine these terms to ascertain whether the trust was created for legitimate estate planning purposes or as a mechanism to shield assets from equitable distribution. For example, if the trust terms grant the grantor (the person who created the trust) significant control over the assets, even after the transfer, a court might view the trust with skepticism and deem the house a marital asset subject to division. Conversely, an irrevocable trust with independent trustees and clear, long-standing estate planning goals might be viewed more favorably.
Consider the scenario where a trust includes a “spendthrift provision,” designed to protect beneficiaries from creditors. While this provision can be beneficial in many contexts, a court may scrutinize its application in a divorce case, particularly if it appears designed to prevent the spouse from accessing marital assets. Furthermore, provisions concerning the distribution of income or principal, the process for amending or terminating the trust, and the powers of the trustee will all be carefully evaluated. A trust that allows for easy modification or termination by the grantor shortly before or during divorce proceedings may be seen as a sham, indicating an intent to manipulate asset ownership for personal gain. The absence of clear and well-defined terms can create ambiguity, making it easier for a court to disregard the trust or order modifications to ensure a fair division of marital property.
In conclusion, the terms and provisions of a trust are of paramount importance when considering the transfer of a house before a divorce. These provisions determine the degree of control retained by the grantor, the rights of the beneficiaries, and the overall validity of the trust. Courts will meticulously examine these terms to prevent the misuse of trusts for asset concealment. Therefore, careful drafting and adherence to legal formalities are essential to ensure that the trust serves its intended purpose while withstanding potential challenges during divorce proceedings. Engaging legal counsel experienced in both trust law and family law is crucial to navigate these complexities and mitigate potential risks.
6. Impact on spousal support
The transfer of a house into a trust prior to divorce proceedings can significantly influence spousal support determinations. The value of assets held within the trust and the income they generate are factors courts consider when establishing the appropriate amount and duration of spousal support.
-
Effect on Available Assets
The primary impact arises from the potential reduction in available assets for calculating spousal support. If a home, a significant asset, is transferred to a trust, the spouse who transferred it might argue a diminished capacity to pay support. However, courts scrutinize such transfers, especially those occurring close to the divorce, and may consider the trust assets as constructively available to the transferring spouse if the transfer appears designed to avoid support obligations. If the trust is deemed legitimate and the transferring spouse genuinely lacks access to the house’s value or income derived from it, the court may adjust the spousal support calculation accordingly.
-
Income Generation from the Trust
If the house in the trust is generating income, such as through rental, that income is typically considered when determining the ability to pay spousal support. The spouse benefiting from the rental income may be deemed to have a higher capacity to pay, or the spouse receiving the rental income may have their support needs reduced. The terms of the trust dictate who receives the income and how it can be used, factors that are crucial in determining its impact on spousal support. Courts often require detailed accounting of the trust’s income and expenses to accurately assess its effect on the parties’ financial situations.
-
Needs of the Supported Spouse
Even if a house is legitimately held in a trust, the court must still consider the needs of the spouse seeking support. If the spouse lacks sufficient assets or income to maintain a reasonable standard of living, the court may order spousal support even if the other spouse’s assets are seemingly tied up in a trust. The court can also consider the supported spouse’s contributions to the marriage, including contributions to the preservation or improvement of the house, in determining an appropriate support award. The ultimate goal is to achieve a fair and equitable outcome, balancing the interests of both parties.
-
Impact on Imputation of Income
If the transferring spouse is intentionally underemployed or unemployed, the court may impute income to that spouse based on their earning potential. If the transfer of the house into the trust allows the transferring spouse to reduce their work efforts, the court may consider the potential income that could be generated from the house or from the spouse’s labor, even if those funds are not currently being earned. This imputation of income can significantly affect the spousal support calculation. The burden of proof is generally on the spouse seeking support to demonstrate the other spouse’s ability to earn more.
In conclusion, the existence of a trust holding a house can have a multifaceted impact on spousal support determinations. Courts carefully examine the trust’s validity, its terms, the income it generates, and the needs of both spouses to arrive at a fair and equitable spousal support order. The interplay between the trust and spousal support is complex, highlighting the importance of seeking legal counsel to navigate these issues effectively.
7. Child support considerations
The decision to place a house into a trust before divorce proceedings commences bears direct implications for child support obligations. Child support calculations are predicated on parental income and, in some jurisdictions, assets. Transferring a significant asset like a residence into a trust can ostensibly reduce a parent’s available resources, potentially impacting the calculated child support amount. However, courts will scrutinize such transfers, especially those occurring in close proximity to divorce, to determine their legitimacy. If the transfer is deemed an attempt to shield assets from child support obligations, the court retains the power to include the value of the home in the parent’s available resources for child support calculation purposes. For instance, consider a situation where a parent transfers a rental property into a trust shortly before divorce, and the trust income is directed to someone other than the parent. The court may still consider the potential rental income when calculating the parent’s child support obligation, effectively disregarding the trust’s structure for this specific purpose.
Furthermore, child support guidelines often consider the housing needs of the child. If a custodial parent is residing in a home held within a trust established by the other parent, the court may factor this into the child support calculation, either increasing or decreasing the support amount based on the specific circumstances. The courts primary objective is to ensure the child’s needs are met, and it possesses broad discretion to consider all relevant factors, including the utilization of trust assets for the childs benefit. For example, if a trust is specifically established to provide housing for the child, the court may reduce the basic child support obligation to reflect this contribution. Conversely, if the trust provides no direct benefit to the child, the court may disregard the trust entirely when determining support. The legal framework prioritizes the childs well-being, compelling the court to examine the underlying purpose and practical effects of the trust on the childs financial security.
In conclusion, transferring a house into a trust before divorce to potentially minimize child support payments is a high-risk strategy. Courts are adept at identifying and addressing such maneuvers, prioritizing the child’s right to financial support above attempts to circumvent parental obligations. The complexities involved underscore the necessity of seeking legal counsel from experienced family law attorneys to understand the potential ramifications and ensure compliance with applicable laws. Furthermore, even if the trust is legitimate, its existence and terms will be carefully reviewed to determine its impact on the child’s needs and the parents’ respective financial obligations. The paramount concern remains the child’s well-being, and legal mechanisms exist to prevent asset transfers from unduly affecting child support arrangements.
8. Tax implications of transfer
The act of transferring a house into a trust before divorce carries significant tax implications that warrant careful consideration. These implications extend to both the transfer itself and the ongoing operation of the trust. Understanding these tax aspects is crucial in evaluating the financial prudence of such a strategy.
-
Gift Tax Implications
Transferring a property into a trust can be considered a gift for tax purposes. If the transfer is made to a trust where the grantor (the person making the transfer) does not retain substantial control or benefit, the value of the house, less any consideration received, may be subject to gift tax. The annual gift tax exclusion allows individuals to gift a certain amount each year without incurring gift tax liability. However, if the value of the house exceeds this exclusion, a gift tax return must be filed, and the excess amount will reduce the grantor’s lifetime gift and estate tax exemption. The timing of the transfer relative to divorce can raise concerns that the transfer was made to avoid marital property division, and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) may scrutinize it accordingly.
-
Capital Gains Tax Implications
If the transfer of the house to the trust constitutes a sale (even at less than market value), capital gains taxes may be triggered. Capital gains arise when the fair market value of the house at the time of transfer exceeds the original cost basis (purchase price plus improvements). The difference is the capital gain, which is then taxed at either short-term or long-term capital gains rates, depending on how long the house was held. A transfer into a trust as part of a divorce settlement might qualify for an exception to capital gains tax under certain provisions of the Internal Revenue Code; however, these exceptions are complex and require careful adherence to specific conditions. Failure to meet these conditions can result in significant and unexpected tax liabilities.
-
Property Tax Implications
Transferring a house into a trust may trigger a reassessment of property taxes, depending on the state’s laws. Many jurisdictions have “transfer tax” or reassessment rules that apply when ownership of real property changes. In some cases, the transfer to a trust, even if the grantor remains the primary beneficiary, can be considered a change in ownership for property tax purposes, potentially leading to an increase in the annual property tax bill. This is especially important to consider in states with high property taxes, as the increase can significantly impact the overall cost of maintaining the house within the trust.
-
Income Tax Implications for the Trust
Once the house is held in the trust, any income generated by the property, such as rental income, is taxable to the trust or to the beneficiaries, depending on the type of trust and its provisions. A grantor trust, where the grantor retains control and is treated as the owner for tax purposes, will have its income taxed to the grantor. A non-grantor trust, on the other hand, is a separate tax entity and is taxed on its income at trust income tax rates, which are often higher than individual income tax rates. The choice of trust structure has significant income tax consequences and should be carefully considered in light of the overall financial goals. During a divorce, determining who is responsible for these trust-related taxes can become a point of contention, further complicating the already complex tax landscape.
These tax implications, encompassing gift tax, capital gains tax, property tax, and income tax, underscore the complexity of placing a residence into a trust prior to a divorce. It is crucial to consult with both a qualified tax advisor and an attorney specializing in family law and estate planning to fully understand and address these potential tax consequences. Ignoring these implications can lead to unforeseen financial burdens, potentially undermining the intended benefits of the trust strategy in the context of divorce.
9. Potential for legal challenges
The decision to transfer a house into a trust before divorce invariably creates the potential for legal challenges during the divorce proceedings. The opposing spouse, along with the court, may scrutinize the transfer, leading to various disputes and potential litigation. The likelihood and nature of these challenges depend significantly on the timing of the transfer, its intent, and the specific terms of the trust.
-
Fraudulent Conveyance Claims
One of the most common legal challenges arises from claims of fraudulent conveyance. The opposing spouse may allege that the transfer of the house into the trust was intended to defraud them of their rightful share of marital assets. To succeed, they must typically demonstrate that the transferor intended to hinder, delay, or defraud creditors, including the spouse in a divorce context. Evidence of transfers made shortly before divorce, lack of fair consideration, or continued control of the house by the transferor can bolster such claims. If successful, the court may set aside the transfer, bringing the house back into the marital estate for division. For instance, if a house is transferred to a newly created trust controlled by a family member just weeks before a divorce filing, and no market value exchange occurs, a fraudulent conveyance claim becomes highly probable.
-
Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claims
In some instances, the transferor may also face claims of breach of fiduciary duty. This is particularly relevant if the house was held jointly with the spouse, and the transfer occurred without their knowledge or consent. Spouses often owe each other a fiduciary duty of good faith and fair dealing, requiring them to act in the best interests of the marital community. Transferring a significant community asset to a trust without spousal consent could constitute a breach of this duty, leading to claims for damages or equitable relief. As an example, if one spouse unilaterally transfers a jointly owned rental property, generating income for the marital estate, into a trust benefitting only themselves, the other spouse may successfully pursue a breach of fiduciary duty claim.
-
Valuation Disputes
Even if the transfer is deemed legitimate, disputes may arise regarding the valuation of the house within the trust. Determining the fair market value of the property is essential for equitable distribution purposes. The opposing spouse may challenge the valuation presented by the transferor, potentially requiring expert appraisals and litigation to resolve the discrepancy. Complexities can arise if the trust holds other assets or if the house is subject to encumbrances, further complicating the valuation process. For example, if the house requires significant repairs or is subject to a long-term lease at below-market rates, these factors must be considered in determining its fair market value for divorce settlement purposes.
-
Trust Interpretation Disputes
The interpretation of the trust document itself can become a source of legal challenges. Ambiguous or conflicting provisions within the trust agreement may lead to disputes over the rights and obligations of the beneficiaries, the powers of the trustee, and the overall purpose of the trust. These disputes can necessitate court intervention to interpret the trust’s terms and resolve the conflicting claims. For example, if the trust document contains conflicting language regarding the grantor’s right to access the trust’s assets, the court may be required to interpret the intended meaning of the language based on evidence of the grantor’s intent and the surrounding circumstances.
The potential for these legal challenges highlights the complexities and risks associated with transferring a house into a trust before divorce. Litigation costs can be substantial, and the outcome is often uncertain. Therefore, seeking legal counsel from experienced family law and trust attorneys is essential to navigate these challenges effectively and to minimize the potential for adverse consequences. Furthermore, transparency and full disclosure regarding the transfer and the trust’s terms are crucial in avoiding accusations of fraud or concealment.
Frequently Asked Questions
The following questions and answers address common concerns regarding placing a house into a trust when a divorce is anticipated or underway. These responses provide general information and should not be considered legal advice. Consult with qualified legal counsel for advice tailored to specific circumstances.
Question 1: Does transferring a home into a trust automatically shield it from division in a divorce?
No. The court retains the power to examine the circumstances surrounding the transfer and the trust’s terms to determine if the transfer was made with the intent to defraud the other spouse or circumvent equitable distribution laws. The transfers timing, the grantors intent, and the legitimacy of the trust all influence this determination.
Question 2: What is considered a fraudulent transfer in the context of divorce?
A fraudulent transfer, or fraudulent conveyance, occurs when an individual transfers assets with the intent to hinder, delay, or defraud creditors, including a spouse in a divorce. Transfers occurring shortly before or during divorce proceedings, without fair consideration, are subject to heightened scrutiny.
Question 3: Can a court disregard a trust established before a divorce?
Yes. If the court finds that the trust was created primarily to shield assets from marital property division, it possesses the authority to disregard the trust, order its modification, or include the house in the property division as if the trust did not exist.
Question 4: How do trust terms affect the outcome of a divorce settlement?
Trust terms defining the trustees powers, the beneficiaries rights, and the overall purpose of the trust are meticulously examined. Terms granting the grantor significant control or allowing easy modification may raise suspicion and increase the likelihood of the trust being disregarded.
Question 5: What are the tax implications of transferring a house into a trust before divorce?
Tax implications include potential gift tax, capital gains tax, and property tax reassessment. The transfer can also impact the income tax liabilities of the trust and its beneficiaries. These implications should be carefully evaluated with the assistance of tax professionals.
Question 6: What legal challenges can arise from transferring a house into a trust before divorce?
Potential legal challenges include claims of fraudulent conveyance, breach of fiduciary duty, valuation disputes, and disagreements over the interpretation of the trust agreement. These challenges can lead to costly litigation.
Careful planning and consultation with qualified legal and tax professionals are essential when considering a pre-divorce transfer of a residence into a trust. Transparency and adherence to legal formalities are crucial in minimizing potential risks.
The following section explores related strategies, such as postnuptial agreements, in managing assets during divorce proceedings.
Navigating Asset Transfer
Individuals considering transferring their residence into a trust prior to divorce should carefully evaluate the potential legal and financial ramifications. The following points offer guidance on mitigating risks and ensuring informed decision-making.
Tip 1: Prioritize Early Consultation with Legal Counsel: Engage an attorney specializing in both family law and estate planning well in advance of any anticipated divorce proceedings. Early consultation provides ample time to assess the specific circumstances, explore alternative strategies, and ensure compliance with relevant laws.
Tip 2: Meticulously Document the Purpose of the Trust: Clearly articulate the legitimate estate planning objectives behind establishing the trust, such as long-term care for dependents or minimizing estate taxes. Maintaining thorough documentation supporting these objectives can strengthen the defense against claims of fraudulent conveyance. Evidence of estate planning predating marital discord is especially valuable.
Tip 3: Ensure Fair Consideration in the Transfer: If transferring the house to the trust involves a sale, ensure the sale price reflects the fair market value of the property. Obtaining an independent appraisal to document this value can help avoid allegations that the transfer was intended to deplete marital assets.
Tip 4: Maintain Transparency and Full Disclosure: Fully disclose the existence of the trust and the details of the transfer to the spouse during divorce proceedings. Withholding information can raise suspicions and increase the likelihood of legal challenges. Open communication, while potentially difficult, demonstrates good faith.
Tip 5: Understand the Court’s Authority: Recognize that the court retains significant authority to examine and potentially disregard or modify trusts established prior to divorce. The court’s primary objective is equitable distribution, and it will scrutinize any transfers that appear designed to circumvent this principle.
Tip 6: Evaluate Alternative Asset Protection Strategies: Explore alternative strategies for protecting assets, such as postnuptial agreements or strategic debt management, which may be less susceptible to challenge during divorce proceedings. A tailored approach is preferable to a one-size-fits-all solution.
Careful consideration of these points, coupled with professional legal guidance, can assist individuals in making informed decisions regarding transferring a residence into a trust before divorce. This approach maximizes the likelihood of achieving desired estate planning objectives while minimizing potential legal and financial risks.
The subsequent section presents a concluding perspective, summarizing key insights and emphasizing the need for informed action.
Conclusion
The query “can I put my house in a trust before divorce” necessitates a comprehensive understanding of the legal and financial ramifications involved. This exploration has highlighted the critical importance of timing, intent, and trust structure in determining the validity and enforceability of such a transfer. Courts retain the authority to scrutinize these transactions, particularly those occurring in close proximity to divorce proceedings, to prevent fraudulent conveyance and ensure equitable distribution of marital assets.
Ultimately, the decision to transfer a residence into a trust before divorce requires careful planning and expert legal counsel. The complexities surrounding this issue demand a balanced approach, weighing the potential benefits against the inherent risks. Informed action, guided by a thorough understanding of applicable laws and precedents, is paramount in navigating this intricate intersection of estate planning and family law.
