The Bible offers varying perspectives on remarriage after divorce, leading to diverse interpretations within different Christian denominations. Some interpretations emphasize the sanctity of marriage as a lifelong covenant, suggesting that divorce is permissible only in specific circumstances, such as marital unfaithfulness. This perspective often views remarriage after an unbiblical divorce as adultery. Examples include verses that highlight the permanence of marriage, coupled with specific exceptions granted under certain conditions.
Understanding the historical and cultural context surrounding biblical passages regarding divorce and remarriage is crucial. Marriage in ancient times often served different purposes than it does today, frequently functioning as a social and economic arrangement. Additionally, interpretations of biblical law have evolved throughout history, influencing contemporary views. The benefits of examining these passages thoroughly includes gaining a richer appreciation for the complexities and nuances within scripture, and understanding how varying interpretations have shaped different theological viewpoints.
The following sections will delve into specific biblical texts related to divorce and remarriage, exploring the different interpretations and the theological reasoning behind them. This will cover passages from both the Old and New Testaments, including relevant teachings attributed to Jesus. Additionally, the discussion will address common arguments for and against remarriage after divorce, providing a balanced overview of the subject.
1. Old Testament Allowance
The Old Testament contains provisions that appear to permit or at least regulate divorce and subsequent remarriage, impacting interpretations of “what does the bible say about marrying a divorced woman.” Deuteronomy 24:1-4 outlines a scenario where a man divorces his wife because she finds no favor in his eyes, providing her with a certificate of divorce and allowing her to remarry. This passage suggests a legal framework that acknowledges divorce and the possibility of remarriage. Consequently, this passage is often referenced in discussions about the permissibility of marrying a divorced woman, especially by those advocating for a more lenient interpretation.
The importance of the Old Testament allowance lies in its foundational role in understanding the historical context surrounding marriage and divorce. For instance, some argue that the allowance reflects the social realities of the time, where women often lacked independent means of support. The certificate of divorce, in this view, served to protect the woman and allow her to potentially secure another marriage and a stable life. However, others emphasize the possibility of abuse of this allowance, with men divorcing their wives for trivial reasons. Examples from the Old Testament, such as the story of Hosea being commanded to marry a promiscuous woman, further complicate interpretations, suggesting God’s mercy can extend even to unconventional unions.
Understanding the Old Testament’s allowance for divorce and remarriage is practically significant because it shapes differing Christian views on the subject. While some consider the Old Testament provisions superseded by the New Testament’s teachings on the sanctity of marriage, others see them as demonstrating God’s compassion and recognition of human fallibility. Challenges arise in reconciling these perspectives, and the interpretation of the Old Testament remains a crucial element in the ongoing debate surrounding the moral implications of marrying a divorced woman.
2. New Testament Restrictions
The New Testament introduces apparent restrictions on divorce and remarriage, impacting perspectives on “what does the bible say about marrying a divorced woman.” Jesus’ teachings in Matthew 19:9, for example, state that anyone who divorces their wife, except for sexual immorality (Greek: porneia), and marries another woman commits adultery. This passage, along with parallel accounts in Mark 10:11-12 and Luke 16:18, forms a cornerstone of arguments against remarriage after divorce, particularly when the initial divorce was not due to infidelity. The cause of this restriction, according to some interpretations, stems from a desire to restore marriage to its original, intended state as a lifelong covenant, as established in Genesis. As such, the importance of these New Testament restrictions lies in their challenge to the existing societal norms surrounding divorce prevalent at the time of Jesus, and their emphasis on the sacredness of marital commitment.
Further analysis reveals the significance of the porneia exception clause. While the exact meaning of porneia is debated, it generally refers to various forms of sexual immorality beyond adultery, potentially including incest or pre-marital unchastity. Some argue that this exception allows for divorce and remarriage only in cases of egregious sexual sin, while others interpret it more broadly. For example, some denominations permit divorce and remarriage in cases of prolonged abandonment or abuse, arguing that such situations effectively break the marital covenant, mirroring the effect of sexual immorality. The practical application of these restrictions necessitates careful consideration of the specific circumstances surrounding the divorce, coupled with a thorough understanding of the theological implications of porneia.
In conclusion, the New Testaments apparent restrictions significantly influence the understanding of “what does the bible say about marrying a divorced woman.” These restrictions, particularly Jesus teachings on adultery and the exception clause regarding porneia, create challenges in interpreting the permissibility of remarriage following divorce. Reconciling these seemingly restrictive passages with the Old Testament’s allowance and the overarching themes of forgiveness and redemption requires ongoing theological engagement and nuanced application to real-life situations, acknowledging the complexities inherent in human relationships and the multifaceted nature of biblical interpretation.
3. Adultery implications
The concept of adultery holds a central position in biblical discussions surrounding marriage and divorce, directly influencing the interpretation of “what does the bible say about marrying a divorced woman.” Several passages, particularly within the New Testament, link remarriage after divorce to the act of adultery. Specifically, when a divorce occurs for reasons other than sexual immorality (as some interpret porneia), the remarriage of either party is viewed by some as committing adultery. The underlying principle emphasizes the unbroken covenant of marriage, suggesting that unless a fundamental breach, like infidelity, dissolves the marital bond, it remains intact in God’s eyes. The importance of adultery implications arises from the strong moral condemnation of adultery throughout the Bible, casting a shadow over any remarriage considered to fall under this category. One example is drawn from Jesus’s teachings which state that anyone who divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another woman commits adultery against her.
The practical implication of this understanding is significant, shaping the views of many Christian denominations regarding remarriage. Some denominations strictly prohibit remarriage after divorce unless the divorce was a direct result of adultery committed by the former spouse. Other denominations offer a more lenient approach, allowing for remarriage under specific circumstances, often involving repentance, forgiveness, and attempts at reconciliation. These denominations might emphasize the grace and mercy offered through Christ, arguing that past sins, including those related to divorce and remarriage, can be forgiven. This divergence in interpretation highlights the difficulty in applying biblical principles to complex real-life situations, where the causes and consequences of divorce can be multifaceted.
In conclusion, adultery implications constitute a critical aspect of determining “what does the bible say about marrying a divorced woman.” The concept’s significance rests on its direct connection to the sanctity of marriage and the prohibition against sexual immorality. While the Bible offers clear warnings against adultery, the application of these warnings to the context of remarriage after divorce remains a subject of ongoing debate and varying interpretations, depending on theological perspective and the specific circumstances surrounding the divorce. The challenges persist in harmonizing scriptural principles with the realities of broken relationships and the pursuit of forgiveness.
4. Innocent party consideration
The concept of an “innocent party” arises frequently in discussions about divorce and remarriage, and its perceived status significantly impacts interpretations of what the Bible says about marrying a divorced woman. The “innocent party” generally refers to the spouse who did not initiate the divorce and who is considered to be the victim of the other spouse’s actions, such as adultery or abandonment. The assumption often made is that the spouse whose actions led to the dissolution of the marriage bears the greater responsibility. Thus, some interpretations of scripture grant greater latitude to the “innocent party” regarding remarriage, suggesting that they are not subject to the same restrictions as the spouse deemed responsible for the divorce. The importance of “innocent party consideration” rests on the perceived injustice of penalizing a person for the failings of another. The real-life examples might include a spouse abandoned for another relationship or a spouse subjected to repeated abuse, suggesting a significant distinction in culpability.
However, the application of the “innocent party” principle faces considerable challenges. Determining which spouse truly constitutes the “innocent party” can be complex, as marital breakdowns are rarely attributable solely to one individual. The contribution of both partners, however disproportionate, to the issues precipitating divorce complicates the judgment. Moreover, scripture offers limited explicit guidance on identifying or treating an “innocent party” differently. The potential for self-deception or biased perspectives further hinders accurate assessment. For example, individuals may rationalize their actions, portraying themselves as the victim, even when their behavior contributed significantly to the marital breakdown. This subjectivity raises questions about the reliability of assigning an “innocent” status and the ethical implications of using it to justify remarriage.
In conclusion, the consideration of an “innocent party” introduces a complex layer to the interpretation of what the Bible says about marrying a divorced woman. Although the intuition to offer leniency to a victim of marital breakdown is understandable, the lack of clear biblical directive and the inherent challenges in accurately assigning blame create significant obstacles. The implications for various denominations range from strict adherence to remarriage prohibitions regardless of fault, to more nuanced positions that permit remarriage for those deemed unfairly wronged, reflecting a diverse theological landscape. The ultimate decision necessitates careful discernment, humility, and an awareness of the potential for misjudgment.
5. Hardness of heart
The concept of “hardness of heart” is critically relevant when considering “what does the bible say about marrying a divorced woman.” It provides a theological lens through which to understand the circumstances surrounding divorce and the permissibility of remarriage. “Hardness of heart” represents a resistance to God’s will, a stubborn refusal to adhere to His commands, and a lack of empathy or compassion in interpersonal relationships. It suggests a condition where individuals prioritize their desires over God’s intentions for marriage, potentially leading to actions that result in divorce.
-
Old Testament Context
The Old Testament acknowledges “hardness of heart” as a reason for God’s allowance of divorce in Deuteronomy 24:1-4. Moses permitted divorce because of the people’s hard hearts, suggesting a concession to human fallibility rather than an endorsement of divorce as ideal. The implication is that God recognized the reality of broken relationships caused by human sinfulness and provided a legal framework to regulate its consequences, not to condone it. Examples include situations where abuse or neglect made remaining in a marriage untenable. This allowance does not necessarily translate to an endorsement of marrying a divorced person, but rather provides a means of navigating a broken world.
-
Jesus’s Rebuke
Jesus addressed the issue of “hardness of heart” directly in Matthew 19:8, stating that Moses permitted divorce because of the people’s hardness of heart, but “from the beginning it was not so.” This assertion highlights that God’s original intention for marriage was permanence and indissolubility. Jesus used “hardness of heart” to explain why the Old Testament law was less strict than the ideal. This has ramifications for understanding the New Testament perspective; if divorce stems from “hardness of heart,” then remarriage might perpetuate or condone that condition. A modern-day example might include a divorce initiated for selfish reasons, where one partner abandons the marriage for personal gain or gratification.
-
Moral Responsibility
“Hardness of heart” emphasizes the moral responsibility of individuals within a marriage. It shifts the focus from legalistic interpretations of scripture to the underlying attitudes and behaviors that contribute to marital breakdown. Recognizing “hardness of heart” in oneself or one’s partner necessitates acknowledging personal culpability in the failure of the marriage. It speaks to the importance of repentance and seeking reconciliation wherever possible before considering divorce. Examples include instances where individuals refuse to forgive, compromise, or seek professional help to address marital issues, choosing instead to prioritize their own desires. In this context, marrying a divorced person, especially if the divorce was due to “hardness of heart,” could be viewed as enabling a lack of accountability.
-
Forgiveness and Redemption
While “hardness of heart” contributes to divorce, the Christian faith emphasizes forgiveness and redemption. Acknowledging one’s “hardness of heart” is the first step toward seeking healing and restoration. It is possible for individuals to overcome their “hardness of heart” through repentance, confession, and a commitment to living according to God’s will. In the context of “what does the bible say about marrying a divorced woman,” the concept of “hardness of heart” should not be used to condemn individuals or prevent them from finding love and companionship. Instead, it should serve as a reminder of the importance of seeking God’s guidance and striving to embody His love and compassion in all relationships. Examples include a person who acknowledges their past selfishness and actively seeks to demonstrate humility and selflessness in future relationships, showing a transformed heart.
Ultimately, the connection between “hardness of heart” and “what does the bible say about marrying a divorced woman” underscores the complex interplay between divine law, human fallibility, and the possibility of redemption. It highlights the need for discernment, compassion, and a commitment to seeking God’s will in navigating the challenges of marriage, divorce, and remarriage. While scripture offers guidelines and principles, applying them requires a nuanced understanding of individual circumstances and a recognition of the transformative power of God’s grace.
6. Forgiveness principle
The principle of forgiveness holds a crucial position in the discourse surrounding “what does the bible say about marrying a divorced woman.” Christian theology emphasizes forgiveness as a core tenet, reflecting God’s grace and mercy toward humanity. In the context of divorce, this principle necessitates extending forgiveness both to oneself and to the former spouse, regardless of the circumstances leading to the marital breakdown. The act of forgiveness does not necessarily condone the actions that led to divorce, but it acknowledges the reality of human fallibility and offers a path toward healing and reconciliation, if possible. Thus, the importance of the forgiveness principle lies in its transformative potential, allowing individuals to move beyond bitterness and resentment and to embrace a future free from the constraints of the past. Real-life examples could include a divorced person who actively seeks to forgive their former spouse for infidelity, enabling them to find peace and emotional well-being, or a community that supports a divorced person in their journey of forgiveness, helping them to reintegrate into social life.
Furthermore, forgiveness complicates the interpretation of biblical passages concerning remarriage. While some interpretations strictly prohibit remarriage after divorce, others offer a more nuanced perspective that incorporates the principle of forgiveness. In this view, if genuine repentance and forgiveness have occurred, the past divorce should not necessarily be a barrier to future relationships. Some denominations, for example, allow for remarriage after divorce if both parties have confessed their sins, sought forgiveness from God and each other, and demonstrated a commitment to living according to Christian principles. However, the application of this principle raises complex questions. How can genuine repentance and forgiveness be verified? What constitutes a sufficient demonstration of changed behavior? Should the “innocent party” be held to a different standard of forgiveness than the party deemed responsible for the divorce? These are questions that continue to be debated within Christian communities.
In conclusion, the connection between the forgiveness principle and “what does the bible say about marrying a divorced woman” underscores the tension between adhering to strict interpretations of biblical law and embracing the transformative power of grace and mercy. The forgiveness principle compels individuals to move beyond judgment and condemnation, offering a path toward healing and restoration. The challenges lie in applying this principle consistently and fairly, while also upholding the sanctity of marriage and addressing the complex realities of human relationships. Ultimately, navigating this issue requires careful discernment, humility, and a commitment to seeking God’s will through prayer and study of scripture, recognizing that the answers may not always be clear-cut or universally agreed upon. It speaks of love and acceptance.
7. Remarriage exceptions
The concept of remarriage exceptions significantly influences the interpretation of biblical teachings regarding marriage and divorce, directly shaping the understanding of “what does the bible say about marrying a divorced woman.” These exceptions, derived from varying interpretations of specific biblical passages, propose circumstances under which remarriage might be permissible despite general prohibitions.
-
The “Porneia” Clause
The “porneia” clause, found in Matthew 19:9, constitutes a primary basis for remarriage exceptions. This clause, where Jesus states that divorce is permissible “except for sexual immorality” ( porneia in Greek), suggests that sexual infidelity fundamentally violates the marital covenant, thereby releasing the innocent party to remarry. The implications for “what does the bible say about marrying a divorced woman” are substantial, as it provides a scriptural justification for remarriage in cases of adultery. The definition and scope of porneia, however, remain debated, with some interpretations extending it beyond adultery to include other forms of sexual sin or moral depravity that undermine the marital bond.
-
Desertion by an Unbeliever
1 Corinthians 7:15 presents another potential exception, stating that “God has called us to peace” and that “a brother or sister is not under bondage in such cases” when an unbelieving spouse deserts a believing spouse. This passage is interpreted by some to mean that abandonment by an unbeliever effectively dissolves the marriage bond, freeing the believer to remarry. The practical significance for “what does the bible say about marrying a divorced woman” lies in its allowance for remarriage in situations where the marital relationship has been irrevocably broken by the actions of a non-Christian spouse. This is only applicable, if it can be shown that all efforts to reconcile has been attempted.
-
Death of a Spouse
Romans 7:2-3 explicitly states that a woman is bound to her husband as long as he lives, but if the husband dies, she is released from the law of marriage and is free to marry another man. This exception aligns with the understanding of marriage as a covenant that ends upon the death of one spouse. Thus, the implications for “what does the bible say about marrying a divorced woman” would be, that the rules for marriage does not apply, due to it now being considered a widow, and therefore free to marry again. A common real-life example would be an individual who was divorced but subsequently finds that the divorced spouse has passed away. Therefore this person is now free to marry again.
-
Spiritual Adultery
A less common, but still relevant, interpretation suggests an exception for what is termed “spiritual adultery.” This concept argues that certain behaviors, while not explicitly sexual, can fundamentally betray the marital covenant in a manner analogous to physical adultery. Examples might include prolonged abandonment, severe emotional or psychological abuse, or a complete abdication of marital responsibilities. While this interpretation lacks explicit scriptural support, proponents argue that such behaviors can effectively sever the emotional and spiritual bonds of marriage, justifying divorce and subsequent remarriage. The role of “spiritual adultery” in influencing “what does the bible say about marrying a divorced woman” lies in its attempt to apply the underlying principles of covenant faithfulness to situations beyond the strict letter of the law, emphasizing the spirit of the law over its literal interpretation.
In summary, these remarriage exceptions represent attempts to reconcile the tension between the biblical emphasis on the permanence of marriage and the realities of broken relationships. The interpretation and application of these exceptions vary considerably among different Christian denominations, reflecting diverse theological perspectives on the nature of marriage, divorce, and forgiveness, which informs the different understanding to “what does the bible say about marrying a divorced woman”.
8. Interpretational differences
Interpretational differences form the core determinant in understanding “what does the bible say about marrying a divorced woman.” The Bible, while considered divinely inspired by many, is a collection of texts written across centuries, in different languages, and within distinct cultural contexts. This inherent complexity necessitates interpretation, leading to a diverse range of viewpoints on issues like divorce and remarriage. These differences arise from variations in hermeneutical approaches, theological presuppositions, and the weight given to specific biblical passages. The practical effect of these differences is the existence of denominations with markedly different stances on the permissibility of marrying a divorced person.
The causal link between interpretational differences and varying perspectives on this topic is direct. For example, some interpret Jesus’s words in Matthew 19:9 as an absolute prohibition against remarriage after divorce, except in cases of sexual immorality, while others view the “porneia” clause as encompassing a broader range of marital misconduct. Some also emphasize the historical context of the Old Testament’s allowance of divorce, arguing that those provisions were concessions to human weakness that have been superseded by the New Testament’s higher standard. The importance of interpretational differences as a component of understanding “what does the bible say about marrying a divorced woman” cannot be overstated, as it shapes not only individual beliefs but also the doctrines and practices of entire religious communities. This affects the rules or lack thereof.
The practical significance of acknowledging these interpretational differences lies in fostering greater understanding and tolerance among different Christian traditions. Recognizing that sincere believers hold differing views based on their understanding of scripture can promote respectful dialogue and avoid unnecessary division. Challenges persist in navigating these differences, particularly when they impact personal relationships and decisions. However, a commitment to studying scripture thoughtfully and engaging with diverse perspectives can contribute to a more informed and compassionate understanding of this complex issue. In conclusion, interpretational differences are fundamental to understanding “what does the bible say about marrying a divorced woman” because of its dependence on the interpretation of religious and biblical texts.
Frequently Asked Questions
This section addresses common inquiries regarding the biblical viewpoint on marrying a divorced woman, providing concise answers based on prevalent interpretations of scripture.
Question 1: Does the Old Testament permit marrying a divorced woman?
The Old Testament contains passages that regulate divorce and remarriage, suggesting a tacit acceptance of the practice within specific social and legal contexts. Deuteronomy 24:1-4 outlines conditions for divorce and subsequent remarriage, although this allowance is often viewed as a concession to human weakness rather than an endorsement of divorce itself.
Question 2: What is the New Testament perspective on marrying a divorced woman?
The New Testament presents a stricter view of marriage, emphasizing its permanence and indissolubility. Jesus’ teachings in Matthew 19:9, for example, state that remarriage after divorce, except in cases of sexual immorality, constitutes adultery. This passage forms the basis for many denominations’ prohibition against marrying a divorced woman.
Question 3: What does the Bible say about the “innocent party” in a divorce?
The Bible does not explicitly address the concept of an “innocent party” in divorce. However, some interpretations suggest that the spouse who did not initiate the divorce and is considered a victim of the other spouse’s actions may be viewed with greater leniency regarding remarriage. This view is often based on the principle of justice and the perceived unfairness of penalizing someone for the failings of another.
Question 4: Does the “porneia” clause in Matthew 19:9 permit remarriage?
The “porneia” clause, where Jesus allows divorce “except for sexual immorality,” is a subject of ongoing debate. Some interpret “porneia” narrowly, referring only to adultery, while others view it more broadly, encompassing various forms of sexual sin or moral depravity. This difference in interpretation affects whether remarriage is considered permissible in cases beyond adultery.
Question 5: How does the principle of forgiveness apply to marrying a divorced woman?
The principle of forgiveness is central to Christian theology and suggests that past sins, including those related to divorce, can be forgiven. However, the application of forgiveness to the issue of remarriage is complex. Some argue that genuine repentance and forgiveness can pave the way for remarriage, while others maintain that the covenant of marriage remains binding despite forgiveness.
Question 6: Are there any specific exceptions to the prohibition against marrying a divorced woman?
Besides the “porneia” clause, some interpretations suggest other exceptions, such as abandonment by an unbelieving spouse (1 Corinthians 7:15) or the death of the divorced spouse (Romans 7:2-3). However, these exceptions are not universally accepted, and their application remains a matter of ongoing theological debate.
The information presented reflects prevalent interpretations of scripture regarding this topic. Individual beliefs and denominational stances may vary significantly.
The subsequent section will explore resources for further study and guidance on this complex issue.
Navigating the Complexities
The following tips provide guidance for navigating the complex and often debated topic of remarriage after divorce from a biblical perspective. These tips encourage careful study, thoughtful consideration, and respectful dialogue.
Tip 1: Engage in Thorough Scriptural Study: The foundation of understanding lies in examining the relevant biblical passages with diligence. Pay attention to the historical context, the original languages (if possible), and the different literary genres employed. Focus on passages in both the Old and New Testaments related to marriage, divorce, and remarriage, such as Deuteronomy 24:1-4, Matthew 19, and 1 Corinthians 7.
Tip 2: Acknowledge Varying Interpretations: Recognize that sincere Christians hold diverse viewpoints on this issue. Interpretational differences stem from theological presuppositions, hermeneutical approaches, and the weight given to specific passages. Be open to understanding different perspectives, even if they differ from one’s own.
Tip 3: Consider the Historical and Cultural Context: Understand the social and cultural context in which the biblical texts were written. Marriage in ancient times often served different purposes than it does today, and societal norms influenced the understanding of divorce and remarriage. Taking this context into account can provide a richer understanding of the biblical passages.
Tip 4: Examine the Concept of “Hardness of Heart”: Reflect on the role of “hardness of heart” as a factor contributing to marital breakdown. Consider whether a lack of empathy, compassion, or a refusal to seek reconciliation played a role in the divorce. This reflection can foster personal accountability and promote a more nuanced understanding of the issue.
Tip 5: Emphasize the Principle of Forgiveness: Prioritize the principle of forgiveness in approaching the topic of remarriage. Forgiveness extends both to oneself and to the former spouse, regardless of the circumstances. Embrace forgiveness as a path towards healing and moving forward, while still upholding biblical principles.
Tip 6: Seek Counsel from Trusted Sources: Engage in conversations with trusted pastors, theologians, or counselors who possess a solid understanding of scripture and are equipped to provide guidance on this complex issue. Seek counsel that is grounded in biblical principles and demonstrates sensitivity to the complexities of individual situations.
Tip 7: Avoid Legalistic Judgments: Refrain from making legalistic judgments about individuals who have divorced and remarried. Acknowledge the complexities of human relationships and the potential for unforeseen circumstances. Focus on extending grace, compassion, and understanding rather than condemnation.
Careful study of the scriptures on the topic of “what does the bible say about marrying a divorced woman,” understanding the interpretational differeces, and seeking wise council can promote compassion and wisdom in a difficult life decision.
The subsequent section will conclude this exploration by summarizing the article.
Conclusion
The preceding exploration of “what does the bible say about marrying a divorced woman” reveals a complex and multifaceted issue. Biblical texts offer varying perspectives, ranging from apparent allowances in the Old Testament to stricter pronouncements in the New Testament. Interpretational differences, historical context, and the application of principles like forgiveness and “hardness of heart” contribute to diverse viewpoints within Christian traditions. The question lacks a singular, universally accepted answer, necessitating careful study and discernment.
Navigating this complex issue demands intellectual honesty, spiritual humility, and a commitment to seeking God’s will through scripture and prayer. Individuals facing decisions about marrying a divorced person should engage in thorough study, seek counsel from trusted sources, and approach the matter with grace and compassion. The ultimate resolution rests on a sincere desire to honor God and uphold biblical principles within the unique circumstances of each situation.
