Marital dissolution significantly influenced by spousal relationships with their partner’s family represents a complex sociological phenomenon. Such breakdowns frequently arise from conflicts involving differing expectations, boundaries, or perceived intrusions by parental figures or siblings of one spouse upon the marital unit. For example, persistent financial support demanded by a parent-in-law or constant criticism of a spouse’s behavior by a sibling-in-law can escalate into irreconcilable marital discord.
The impact of familial relationships on marital stability is considerable and spans diverse cultures and historical periods. Historically, extended family units played a more significant role in daily life, increasing the potential for both support and interference in spousal matters. While strong family bonds are often valued, excessive involvement can erode the autonomy of the marital relationship and lead to feelings of resentment and alienation. This strain on the marital bond frequently contributes to a diminished sense of marital satisfaction and increased risk of separation.
Subsequent sections will delve into specific aspects of this phenomenon. These include common sources of conflict stemming from relationships with relatives of a spouse, legal considerations regarding marital property and familial obligations, and available resources for conflict resolution and family counseling. Exploration of these topics aims to provide a clearer understanding of the dynamics involved and potential pathways toward mitigating negative outcomes.
1. Interference
Interference from a spouse’s family constitutes a significant factor in marital discord and potential dissolution. Characterized by unsolicited advice, intrusive actions, and attempts to control marital decisions, such interference can undermine the autonomy and stability of the spousal relationship. The following facets illuminate the impact of familial intrusion on marital harmony.
-
Financial Involvement
Unsolicited financial contributions or demands by in-laws can create tension. For example, if in-laws consistently provide financial support with implicit or explicit expectations of control over spending habits or major purchases, this may lead to resentment and a feeling of loss of independence within the marriage. In extreme cases, financial dependence imposed by in-laws can dictate the living arrangements, career choices, or even child-rearing practices, leading to marital conflict and potential separation.
-
Decision-Making Encroachment
When in-laws attempt to exert undue influence over critical marital decisions, such as where to live, how to raise children, or career choices, this represents a significant form of interference. For instance, if parents consistently undermine parental authority by disagreeing with discipline methods or offering unsolicited advice that contradicts agreed-upon parenting strategies, it can fracture the united front necessary for effective child-rearing and create animosity between spouses.
-
Emotional Manipulation
In-laws employing emotional tactics, such as guilt-tripping or playing favorites, to manipulate spousal behavior represents a subtle but damaging form of interference. An example is a parent-in-law who constantly makes disparaging remarks about the spouse to their child, fostering distrust and resentment. Or a situation where a parent plays one spouse against another to have their demands or expectations met. Such behavior can erode the marital bond and foster feelings of isolation.
-
Boundary Violations
In-laws who disregard established boundaries regarding visits, communication, or privacy are demonstrating a disruptive form of interference. Examples include unannounced visits, constant phone calls or messages at inappropriate times, or sharing personal information without consent. These boundary violations can lead to feelings of being controlled or disrespected, thereby damaging the marital relationship.
The cumulative effect of these interference facets can create an environment of constant stress and conflict within the marital relationship. When spouses feel that their autonomy is compromised and their marital bond is threatened by external influences, the likelihood of seeking legal separation increases substantially. Successfully navigating the challenges posed by in-law interference requires clear communication, established boundaries, and a united front between spouses to protect the integrity of their relationship.
2. Boundaries
The establishment and maintenance of clear, respectful boundaries are critical for marital stability. A deficiency in these boundaries concerning in-laws frequently contributes to marital discord and increases the likelihood of marital dissolution. Clear delineation of acceptable conduct and interaction limits the potential for familial overreach, safeguarding the autonomy and integrity of the marital unit.
-
Physical Space and Privacy
Disregard for personal space and privacy, such as unannounced visits or intrusion into the marital home, erodes spousal comfort and autonomy. In-laws who frequently appear without prior notice or enter the couple’s residence uninvited demonstrate a lack of respect for established boundaries. This can lead to a feeling of constant invasion, creating tension and resentment between spouses. Such persistent violations may necessitate legal separation as a means of reclaiming personal space and privacy.
-
Communication Protocols
Inappropriate communication methods, frequencies, or content constitute a significant boundary infringement. Constant phone calls, excessive messaging, or the expectation of immediate responses can be disruptive to the spousal relationship. Direct communication with one spouse about concerns more appropriately addressed to the couple jointly can create a divisive dynamic. Ignoring established communication protocols can undermine spousal autonomy and foster feelings of being controlled or manipulated.
-
Financial Autonomy
Unsolicited financial advice or involvement in spousal financial decisions represents a significant boundary violation. While well-intentioned, interventions in spending habits, investment strategies, or debt management can create tension and undermine the financial autonomy of the marital unit. Demanding financial support or imposing financial obligations on the couple also represents an unacceptable encroachment. Clear boundaries regarding financial independence are vital for maintaining marital harmony.
-
Parenting Styles and Child-Rearing
Disagreement on parenting philosophies and child-rearing practices can become a major source of conflict when in-laws overstep boundaries. Undermining parental decisions, offering unsolicited advice, or directly interfering with disciplinary measures can erode spousal authority and create confusion for the children. When in-laws consistently contradict or disregard agreed-upon parenting strategies, the marital bond can suffer, potentially leading to irreconcilable differences.
Effective boundary management is essential to mitigate the potential for in-law interference to disrupt the marital relationship. Successful strategies often involve clear communication, mutual agreement between spouses on established limits, and consistent enforcement of those boundaries. Failure to address boundary violations can result in escalating conflict, diminished spousal satisfaction, and an increased risk of marital dissolution.
3. Expectations
Unrealistic or conflicting expectations between spouses and their in-laws frequently serve as catalysts for marital conflict, contributing significantly to marital dissolution. These expectations, whether explicitly stated or implicitly assumed, can encompass a range of issues from financial assistance to childcare responsibilities, and significantly impact the dynamic between the couple and their extended family.
-
Financial Support and Inheritance
Expectations regarding financial support, either from in-laws to the married couple or vice versa, often generate tension. If in-laws expect financial assistance from the couple when the couple themselves are struggling, this can create resentment. Similarly, differing expectations about inheritance plans can lead to disputes, particularly if one spouse feels their family is being unfairly treated compared to the other. The perceived unfairness can erode marital harmony and contribute to feelings of resentment.
-
Childcare and Grandparenting Roles
Conflicting expectations regarding childcare practices or the degree of involvement of grandparents in raising children are common sources of friction. If in-laws expect to have significant control over how grandchildren are raised or demand frequent visits, it can clash with the parents’ own values and parenting styles. Conversely, if the couple expects in-laws to provide regular childcare but the in-laws are unwilling or unable to do so, this can lead to disappointment and strain the relationship.
-
Household Help and Domestic Responsibilities
Expectations about household help and domestic responsibilities can also lead to marital discord. If in-laws expect one spouse to bear the primary responsibility for household chores or to provide care for them as they age, it can create an imbalance in the marital relationship and lead to resentment. Similarly, if the couple expects in-laws to assist with household tasks but the in-laws do not fulfill those expectations, it can create frustration and tension.
-
Social Obligations and Family Events
Differing expectations regarding attendance at family events and the degree of involvement in social obligations can contribute to marital conflict. If one spouse feels pressured to attend every family gathering or to conform to certain traditions, it can create resentment. Conversely, if the other spouse feels neglected or excluded from their partner’s family events, it can lead to feelings of isolation and alienation. The balance between marital unity and familial obligations is critical for marital satisfaction.
These unmet or misaligned expectations often lead to persistent conflict, creating an atmosphere of stress and resentment within the marriage. When spouses feel that their needs and values are being consistently disregarded or undermined by their in-laws’ expectations, the marital bond weakens. The cumulative effect of these unresolved conflicts can ultimately contribute to the breakdown of the marriage, highlighting the importance of clear communication and realistic expectations within the extended family system.
4. Finances
Financial matters frequently serve as a significant nexus for conflict between spouses and their in-laws, often contributing to marital discord and, in severe cases, marital dissolution. The influence of familial financial dynamics on spousal relationships warrants careful consideration, as it can introduce complexities that undermine marital stability.
-
Financial Dependency of In-Laws
Situations where in-laws are financially dependent on the married couple can create significant strain. If in-laws require ongoing financial support for living expenses, medical bills, or other necessities, the financial burden placed on the couple can lead to resentment and disagreements about resource allocation. This can be particularly problematic if one spouse feels their partner’s family is taking advantage of their generosity, or if the financial strain limits the couple’s ability to achieve their own financial goals. For example, constant financial requests can create a feeling of being used, which is fertile ground for marital problems.
-
Inheritance Expectations and Disputes
Disagreements or perceived unfairness related to inheritance prospects often fuel familial tension. If one spouse anticipates a larger inheritance than the other, or if in-laws favor one child over another in their estate planning, it can create a sense of inequity and resentment. Disputes over inheritance may also arise after the death of a parent-in-law, particularly if the will is perceived as unfair or unclear. Such disputes can lead to protracted legal battles and further damage familial relationships, increasing the strain on the marriage.
-
Business Involvement and Financial Meddling
In-laws who become financially involved in the couple’s business or make unsolicited financial recommendations can create conflicts and undermine the couple’s autonomy. If in-laws invest in the couple’s business but then attempt to exert undue influence over its operations, it can lead to disagreements about management decisions and financial strategies. Similarly, unsolicited financial advice, even if well-intentioned, can be perceived as intrusive and create resentment if the couple feels their financial decisions are being second-guessed.
-
Financial Transparency and Disclosure
Lack of transparency or honesty about financial matters between spouses and their in-laws can erode trust and create suspicion. If one spouse conceals financial information from their partner or their in-laws, or if in-laws misrepresent their own financial situation, it can lead to feelings of betrayal and resentment. Such a lack of transparency can damage the trust between spouses and their extended families and lead to suspicion. This creates distrust and exacerbates existing conflicts, potentially driving couples to consider marital separation.
Financial matters, therefore, represent a significant and multifaceted domain within the broader context of familial influence on marital stability. These financial influences highlight the importance of clear communication, realistic expectations, and mutual respect in navigating the complex financial landscape within the extended family system. The successful management of financial matters is crucial for maintaining marital harmony and avoiding the escalation of conflict that can contribute to divorce.
5. Criticism
Persistent criticism emanating from a spouse’s family frequently undermines marital stability and serves as a significant contributing factor to marital dissolution. This criticism, often directed at the spouse’s personality, habits, parenting skills, or professional choices, can create a hostile and emotionally damaging environment. The impact of ongoing negative feedback erodes self-esteem, fosters resentment, and damages the marital bond.
Consider, for example, a situation where a mother-in-law consistently criticizes her daughter-in-law’s housekeeping standards or career aspirations, suggesting they are inadequate or detrimental to the family. Such ongoing disparagement can lead the daughter-in-law to feel devalued and unsupported, fostering resentment towards both her spouse and the critical in-law. The spouse, caught in the middle, may struggle to defend their partner while maintaining familial harmony. This internal conflict can strain the marital relationship, leading to a breakdown in communication and increased marital dissatisfaction. In cases where the criticism is pervasive and unrelenting, it can create an emotionally abusive dynamic that ultimately leads to the consideration of divorce as a means of escaping the toxic environment.
The detrimental effect of in-law criticism highlights the importance of establishing and maintaining healthy boundaries, fostering open communication, and prioritizing the marital relationship. Failure to address persistent criticism can result in a gradual erosion of marital satisfaction, increased conflict, and ultimately, an elevated risk of marital dissolution. Successfully navigating this complex dynamic requires a united front between spouses, effective communication skills, and a willingness to address problematic behaviors within the extended family system. Understanding this connection offers a pathway toward preventing marital breakdown stemming from familial discord.
6. Loyalty
Marital fidelity extends beyond romantic exclusivity to encompass unwavering support and prioritization of the spousal relationship, particularly when navigating familial dynamics. Divided loyalties, often manifested in prioritizing parental expectations over spousal needs, represent a significant precursor to marital discord and eventual dissolution.
-
Spousal Prioritization vs. Familial Obligation
The perceived balance between supporting one’s spouse and adhering to familial obligations can become a contentious issue. When a spouse consistently prioritizes the demands or expectations of their family of origin over the needs and concerns of their partner, it can breed resentment and feelings of abandonment. For instance, consistently siding with a parent in a disagreement with the spouse, even when the parent is demonstrably wrong, demonstrates a lack of loyalty that can erode trust and marital stability.
-
Defense Against Criticism
A key aspect of marital loyalty involves defending one’s spouse against criticism or disparagement from family members. Failure to protect a spouse from unwarranted attacks can create feelings of isolation and vulnerability. For example, allowing a parent to constantly belittle or criticize a spouse’s career choices without intervention signals a lack of support and undermines the spousal bond. Active defense and a clear articulation of spousal value are vital to maintaining marital unity.
-
Boundary Enforcement with Family
Loyalty requires establishing and enforcing clear boundaries with family members to protect the spousal relationship. Allowing family to overstep boundaries, such as interfering in marital decisions or constantly criticizing the spouse’s actions, demonstrates a lack of commitment to the marital partnership. Failure to enforce boundaries communicates that the family’s needs and opinions are valued more highly than the spouse’s, creating an imbalance that can lead to marital breakdown.
-
Confidentiality and Trust
Sharing confidential information about the spousal relationship with family members represents a significant breach of loyalty. Discussing marital problems or airing grievances with parents or siblings can undermine trust and create a perception of disloyalty. Spousal unity requires maintaining confidentiality within the marital unit and addressing concerns directly with one’s partner, rather than seeking external validation or support that may ultimately damage the relationship.
These facets of loyalty illustrate the importance of prioritizing the marital relationship over familial pressures. A perceived lack of loyalty, demonstrated through prioritization of family of origin, failure to defend against criticism, inadequate boundary enforcement, or breaches of confidentiality, can erode trust and contribute significantly to marital distress and the eventual consideration of marital dissolution. Reinforcing loyalty demonstrates commitment and preserves marital cohesiveness against external pressures.
7. Respect
Reciprocal respect between spouses and their respective families forms a cornerstone of marital stability. Deficiencies in respect, manifested through disrespectful communication, disregard for boundaries, or devaluation of opinions, can significantly contribute to marital discord and, in extreme cases, marital dissolution. The absence of respectful interaction creates a climate of animosity and resentment, eroding the foundation upon which the marital relationship rests.
Disrespectful communication, such as belittling remarks or dismissive tones, directed towards a spouse by their in-laws can undermine the spouse’s self-esteem and create feelings of isolation within the marital unit. Disregard for established boundaries, whether physical, emotional, or financial, demonstrates a lack of respect for the couple’s autonomy and decision-making authority. Devaluing a spouse’s opinions or contributions, particularly in matters relating to family or finances, signals a lack of respect for their intelligence and judgment. For example, constantly interrupting or dismissing a spouse’s ideas during family discussions sends a clear message of disrespect, potentially leading to resentment and conflict.
Conversely, fostering an environment of mutual respect, where all parties value each other’s opinions and contributions, can strengthen the marital bond and mitigate the negative impact of potential conflicts. Practicing active listening, acknowledging differing viewpoints, and engaging in constructive dialogue can foster understanding and build stronger relationships. Demonstrating respect requires consistent effort and a willingness to recognize and appreciate the unique qualities of each individual. Recognizing and cultivating respect between spouses and their in-laws offers a pathway toward preventing marital breakdown stemming from familial discord.
8. Communication
Effective communication, or the lack thereof, profoundly impacts marital stability, particularly concerning interactions with in-laws. Clear, respectful dialogue can mitigate potential conflicts, while miscommunication or avoidance strategies often exacerbate tensions and increase the risk of marital dissolution. Open communication channels foster understanding and collaboration, crucial elements for navigating complex familial dynamics.
-
Assertive Communication and Boundary Setting
Assertive communication is essential for establishing and maintaining healthy boundaries with in-laws. Spouses who can clearly and respectfully articulate their needs and limits are better equipped to prevent overreach and interference. For example, a spouse who can calmly and directly communicate their discomfort with unsolicited advice regarding parenting is more likely to foster a respectful relationship with their in-laws and protect their marital autonomy. Failure to communicate boundaries assertively can lead to resentment and a perceived lack of control over the marital dynamic.
-
Active Listening and Empathy
Practicing active listening and demonstrating empathy toward both one’s spouse and their family members are crucial for resolving conflicts and fostering understanding. Active listening involves paying close attention to the speaker’s words and emotions, seeking clarification, and demonstrating genuine interest. Empathy requires understanding and sharing the feelings of another person. For example, a spouse who can empathize with their partner’s feelings of being torn between their family and their marital commitments is better positioned to offer support and facilitate constructive dialogue. Lack of empathy and poor listening skills can amplify misunderstandings and escalate conflicts.
-
Conflict Resolution Strategies
Effective conflict resolution strategies are vital for addressing disagreements with in-laws in a constructive and mutually respectful manner. These strategies include identifying the root cause of the conflict, brainstorming potential solutions, and compromising to reach a mutually agreeable outcome. Avoiding personal attacks, focusing on specific behaviors rather than character traits, and maintaining a calm and respectful tone are essential for productive conflict resolution. For example, instead of accusing a mother-in-law of being controlling, a spouse might express their concern that unsolicited advice undermines their autonomy. Poor conflict resolution skills can lead to escalating arguments and irreparable damage to familial relationships.
-
Open and Honest Dialogue Within the Marriage
Maintaining open and honest communication within the marital relationship is paramount for navigating in-law dynamics effectively. Spouses who feel comfortable sharing their concerns and emotions with each other are better equipped to address challenges collaboratively. This includes discussing feelings of discomfort or resentment towards in-laws, as well as strategizing on how to manage interactions in a way that protects the marital bond. Secrecy or avoidance of difficult conversations can breed resentment and undermine trust, making it more difficult to navigate in-law related conflicts successfully.
In summary, communication represents a pivotal factor in mitigating the potential for in-law related conflicts to escalate and contribute to marital dissolution. By fostering assertive communication, practicing active listening and empathy, employing effective conflict resolution strategies, and maintaining open dialogue within the marriage, couples can navigate the complexities of familial relationships and strengthen their marital bond. A breakdown in any of these communication areas increases the risk that familial tensions will lead to marital distress and potential separation.
9. Traditions
Marital discord significantly arises from clashes in familial traditions, impacting the stability of the spousal bond and potentially leading to marital dissolution. The adherence to long-held customs, rituals, or expectations within one family system can conflict with the practices and values of the other, generating tension and resentment. For example, certain cultural or religious traditions may dictate specific roles for men and women within a marriage, influencing household responsibilities, financial decisions, or child-rearing practices. When spouses hold differing views on these traditional roles, conflict often ensues. Consider a scenario where one family expects the wife to prioritize domestic duties while the husband’s family embraces a more egalitarian approach to household labor. This disparity in expectations can lead to persistent disagreements and dissatisfaction within the marriage.
The importance of traditions as a contributing factor to marital breakdown lies in their deep-seated emotional and cultural significance. Familial traditions often represent a connection to heritage, identity, and shared values. Disregarding or challenging these traditions can be perceived as a rejection of the family itself, creating defensiveness and animosity. Further, major life events such as holidays or births may be heavily influenced by established traditions, providing fertile ground for disagreements. For instance, differing religious traditions regarding the celebration of holidays or the naming of children can become sources of contention, particularly when one spouse feels pressured to abandon their own cultural heritage. The resolution of these conflicts requires open communication, mutual respect, and a willingness to compromise, but when these elements are lacking, the cumulative impact of these tradition-related disputes can erode marital satisfaction and cohesion.
Successfully navigating the challenges posed by conflicting traditions necessitates a proactive approach focused on understanding, acceptance, and negotiation. Couples can benefit from exploring each other’s cultural backgrounds and familial expectations before marriage, fostering a deeper appreciation for their respective traditions. Compromise is essential, as neither spouse should be expected to completely abandon their heritage. The ability to create new, shared traditions that blend elements of both family systems can also strengthen the marital bond and promote a sense of unity. When conflicts arise, seeking professional counseling can provide valuable tools for communication and conflict resolution, helping couples navigate the complexities of differing traditions and build a more resilient and harmonious marriage. A lack of understanding, respect, and compromise contributes to discord, potentially ending in marital dissolution.
Frequently Asked Questions
The following section addresses common inquiries regarding the influence of spousal family relationships on marital stability and potential dissolution. The information presented aims to provide clarity on this complex topic.
Question 1: How frequently do issues with in-laws contribute to marital dissolution?
Empirical data indicates that conflicts involving in-laws represent a significant contributing factor to marital distress. While not always the primary cause of divorce, tension stemming from spousal family relationships can exacerbate existing marital problems and increase the likelihood of separation.
Question 2: What specific behaviors of in-laws most commonly lead to marital conflict?
Intrusive behavior, unsolicited advice, financial interference, criticism, and disregard for established boundaries are frequently cited as behaviors that contribute to marital conflict. These actions can undermine spousal autonomy and create a climate of resentment and distrust.
Question 3: Are there legal grounds for divorce solely based on issues with in-laws?
Direct legal grounds for divorce based solely on problematic in-law relationships are uncommon. However, the emotional distress and marital discord resulting from such relationships can be considered as contributing factors within the context of “irreconcilable differences” or “cruel treatment” clauses, depending on jurisdiction.
Question 4: What strategies can be employed to mitigate conflict with in-laws and safeguard a marriage?
Establishing clear boundaries, fostering open communication between spouses, seeking professional counseling, and prioritizing the marital relationship are strategies that can help mitigate conflict and protect marital stability. A unified front between spouses is essential for navigating familial challenges.
Question 5: Does the gender of the spouse impact the severity of in-law related conflict?
Sociological research suggests that wives often experience more significant conflict with their mothers-in-law. However, challenges and friction can arise regardless of the gender of either spouse. Each family dynamic has unique issues and each case is viewed based on its merits.
Question 6: How can professional counseling assist in resolving in-law related marital conflicts?
Professional counseling provides a neutral forum for exploring underlying issues, developing effective communication strategies, and establishing healthy boundaries. A therapist can facilitate constructive dialogue and assist couples in navigating the complexities of their familial relationships.
Addressing these common questions serves to illuminate the significant impact of in-law relationships on marital stability. Proactive communication, boundary setting, and seeking professional guidance can assist couples in mitigating conflict and preserving their marital bond.
The subsequent section will explore available resources for couples experiencing marital distress related to in-law dynamics, including counseling services and legal advice.
Navigating “Divorce Because of In-Laws”
When marital discord arises primarily from conflicts with relatives of a spouse, strategic interventions can prove essential. These guidelines serve to mitigate tensions and foster a more stable marital environment.
Tip 1: Establish and Enforce Clear Boundaries: Defining acceptable behavior from in-laws is paramount. This includes limiting unsolicited advice, restricting unannounced visits, and maintaining financial autonomy. Consistent enforcement of these boundaries reinforces their importance.
Tip 2: Prioritize Spousal Unity: Presenting a united front to in-laws reinforces the marital bond and minimizes opportunities for familial interference. Decisions should be made jointly and communicated clearly, regardless of external pressures.
Tip 3: Practice Assertive Communication: Expressing needs and concerns directly and respectfully can prevent misunderstandings and minimize resentment. Avoid passive-aggressive behavior or indirect communication, as this can exacerbate tensions.
Tip 4: Seek Professional Counseling: A neutral third party can provide valuable insights and facilitate constructive dialogue. Therapists can assist in identifying underlying issues and developing effective communication strategies.
Tip 5: Set Realistic Expectations: Recognizing that familial relationships may not always be harmonious is essential. Accepting differences and adjusting expectations can reduce disappointment and frustration.
Tip 6: Focus on Marital Strengths: Regularly acknowledge and appreciate the positive aspects of the spousal relationship. Reinforcing the foundation of the marriage can help weather external challenges.
Tip 7: Enforce Consequences for Boundary Violations: If in-laws consistently disregard established boundaries, it may be necessary to limit contact or implement temporary separations. Consistent action reinforces the seriousness of boundary violations.
Adherence to these strategies promotes a more balanced and respectful dynamic, reducing the likelihood of marital dissolution stemming from familial conflicts. Focusing on communication and setting the correct standards promotes marital stability.
The preceding sections highlight preventative tactics, the conclusion will discuss legal resources.
Conclusion
This exploration of “divorce because of in laws” reveals a complex interplay of familial dynamics, spousal expectations, and communication patterns. Conflicts stemming from spousal relatives represent a significant stressor on marital stability, potentially culminating in marital dissolution. Unrealistic expectations, boundary violations, and breaches of loyalty contribute to an environment of discord, eroding the foundational trust necessary for spousal unity. Effective communication, assertive boundary setting, and, when needed, professional intervention, offer pathways toward mitigating the adverse effects of familial interference.
Given the gravity of these familial influences, couples are encouraged to proactively address emerging conflicts and prioritize the marital bond. While external support systems play a crucial role, the spousal relationship must remain paramount. Recognizing the pervasive nature of this challenge enables couples to proactively navigate the complexities of familial relationships and safeguard the long-term health and viability of their marriage.
