The topic of remarriage following the dissolution of a marital union is addressed in various passages throughout the Old and New Testaments. Interpretations of these scriptures vary across different Christian denominations and individual theological viewpoints. The primary texts often cited include Deuteronomy 24:1-4, Matthew 5:31-32, Matthew 19:3-9, Mark 10:2-12, Luke 16:18, and 1 Corinthians 7:10-16. These verses present a range of perspectives, from prohibitions against a woman returning to her first husband after marrying another, to allowances for divorce in cases of sexual immorality (often translated from the Greek word porneia), and guidance on separation and reconciliation within marriage.
Understanding the scriptural perspectives on remarriage after marital breakdown requires careful consideration of the historical and cultural context in which these texts were written. Marriage in biblical times was often viewed as a covenant relationship, but also as a social and economic institution. The stability of families and the protection of women and children were important societal concerns. Therefore, regulations concerning divorce and remarriage often aimed to address these practical realities. Differing interpretations arise from questions about the intended audience of these teachings (e.g., Jewish people under the Mosaic Law versus Christians under the New Covenant), the precise meaning of key terms (such as porneia), and the overarching principles of grace and forgiveness within Christian theology.
The following sections will explore these relevant scriptural passages in greater detail, examine the differing interpretations offered by various Christian traditions, and consider the pastoral implications for individuals navigating the complexities of divorce and the potential for subsequent marriages. The nuanced and complex nature of the biblical teachings on this subject requires a thoughtful and prayerful approach to understanding God’s will for individuals in these situations.
1. Deuteronomy 24
Deuteronomy 24:1-4 presents a specific legal regulation concerning remarriage within the Mosaic Law and, consequently, informs some interpretations of biblical perspectives on remarriage after divorce. This passage does not directly address the permissibility of divorce itself but focuses on the circumstances under which a divorced woman could remarry and then potentially return to her first husband.
-
Prohibition of Returning to the First Husband
The core stipulation of Deuteronomy 24:1-4 forbids a man from remarrying his former wife if she has married another man and that second marriage ends in divorce or the death of her second husband. The text states that such a reunion would be an abomination before the Lord and would bring sin upon the land. This prohibition highlights the sanctity of marriage and suggests that the act of marrying another individual fundamentally alters the marital bond, preventing a return to the original union.
-
Protection of Women in Ancient Israel
While seemingly restrictive, this law may have served to protect women in ancient Israel. By preventing a husband from divorcing his wife, allowing her to marry another, and then taking her back at will, the law potentially reduced the likelihood of exploitation and ensured greater stability for women within the societal framework of the time. It provided a degree of security against capricious male behavior.
-
Implications for Contemporary Interpretation
The relevance of Deuteronomy 24:1-4 to contemporary debates about remarriage after divorce is complex. Some interpret this passage as evidence of the seriousness with which God views the marital covenant, arguing that remarriage, in general, should be approached with caution. Others view it as a specific regulation within the Old Testament legal code that does not necessarily apply directly to Christians under the New Covenant, which emphasizes grace and forgiveness. The passage informs discussions about the permanence of marriage and the consequences of breaking that covenant.
-
Focus on Ritual Purity and Avoiding “Defilement”
The language of “defilement” used in Deuteronomy 24:4, suggesting that the land would be defiled if the initial couple re-married, aligns with Old Testament concerns of ritual purity. Some interpret this to mean the re-marriage is inherently sinful in God’s eyes. Others view this as a cultural understanding of the time that should not apply to all circumstances today.
In conclusion, Deuteronomy 24:1-4 contributes to the broader discussion on biblical perspectives on remarriage after divorce by emphasizing the seriousness of the marital bond and establishing specific regulations concerning remarriage in ancient Israel. Interpretations of this passage vary, but it generally serves as a foundational text for discussions about the permanence of marriage and the potential consequences of divorce and remarriage.
2. Matthew 19
Matthew 19:9 presents a pivotal point of contention in understanding the biblical stance on remarriage following divorce. This verse, part of a larger discussion between Jesus and the Pharisees regarding the permissibility of divorce, contains what is often referred to as the “exception clause.” Specifically, Jesus states: “And I say to you, whoever divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another, commits adultery; and whoever marries her who is divorced commits adultery.” The phrase “except for sexual immorality” (often translated from the Greek word porneia) is the core of the interpretive debate. This clause is seen by some as an allowance for divorce, and subsequent remarriage, when sexual unfaithfulness has occurred within the marital relationship. The existence, or lack thereof, of this exception fundamentally shapes one’s view on whether remarriage is ever permissible according to scripture. Without this clause, any remarriage after divorce would be considered adultery.
The interpretation of porneia is crucial to understanding the exception clause. Some scholars argue that porneia refers specifically to pre-marital sexual relations discovered after marriage, thus nullifying the marriage covenant from its inception. Others interpret it more broadly to include any form of extramarital sexual activity, encompassing adultery and other serious sexual sins. This difference in interpretation directly affects the perceived scope of the exception. For example, if porneia is narrowly defined, the exception applies only in a limited number of cases. If broadly defined, it allows for divorce and remarriage in a wider range of circumstances involving sexual infidelity. Denominations and individual Christians hold divergent views on this interpretation, significantly impacting their stances on divorce and remarriage. The practical consequence involves deciding if someone who divorced due to adultery is scripturally free to remarry without committing further sin.
Ultimately, the Matthew 19:9 exception clause plays a central role in shaping views on the permissibility of remarriage after divorce. It represents a critical interpretive juncture, influencing how individuals, churches, and denominations approach this complex issue. The presence of the exception, its scope, and its application are points of ongoing theological discussion. Understanding this clause is essential for anyone seeking to grasp the multifaceted biblical perspectives on marriage, divorce, and remarriage. Its implications extend beyond simple rules, reaching into the core of covenant, forgiveness, and the nature of marriage itself.
3. 1 Corinthians 7 guidance
1 Corinthians 7 offers significant guidance on marriage, divorce, and remarriage, providing a nuanced perspective within the broader biblical discourse. This chapter, authored by the Apostle Paul, addresses specific questions posed by the Corinthian church regarding marital relationships, celibacy, and the implications of conversion within marriage. Its relevance to the question of permissible remarriage after marital dissolution lies in its practical counsel concerning separation, reconciliation, and the unique circumstances of believers married to non-believers. Unlike the direct prohibition of remarriage in some interpretations of the Gospels, 1 Corinthians 7 presents a more pastoral approach, recognizing the complexities of human relationships and offering pragmatic solutions to challenges faced by early Christians.
A crucial element of this chapter is its distinction between the Lord’s command and Paul’s own counsel. Regarding marriage, Paul reiterates the Lord’s instruction that a wife should not separate from her husband (and vice versa). However, he then addresses situations where separation has already occurred, stating that if she does separate, she should remain unmarried or be reconciled to her husband. This emphasis on reconciliation highlights the priority of preserving the marital bond. Furthermore, 1 Corinthians 7 addresses scenarios involving believers married to non-believers. If the non-believing spouse is willing to remain in the marriage, the believer should not seek a divorce, as the believing spouse may sanctify the non-believing one, impacting the children as well. Only if the non-believer departs should the believer allow it, clarifying that in such cases, the believer is not under bondage. This passage is interpreted by some to permit remarriage for the abandoned believer, as the original marital bond is considered to have been broken by the non-believer’s desertion. A real-life application might involve a situation where a believing wife is abandoned by her non-believing husband. According to some interpretations of 1 Corinthians 7, she would be free to remarry.
In conclusion, 1 Corinthians 7 contributes a pastoral and pragmatic dimension to the understanding of marital issues, including remarriage after divorce. While upholding the sanctity of marriage, it acknowledges the realities of separation, abandonment, and the complexities of relationships involving believers and non-believers. The chapter’s guidance emphasizes reconciliation where possible, but also recognizes circumstances where separation is unavoidable, offering specific counsel in such situations. Its nuanced approach provides a valuable counterpoint to more stringent interpretations that prohibit remarriage under all circumstances. However, interpreting 1 Corinthians 7 alongside other relevant scriptures remains a complex task requiring careful consideration of historical context, theological principles, and individual circumstances. The challenges lie in balancing the ideals of marital permanence with the realities of human brokenness and the potential for new beginnings.
4. God’s Mercy and Forgiveness
The doctrines of divine mercy and forgiveness offer a crucial lens through which to examine the biblical teachings on marriage after divorce. While certain scriptural passages appear to establish strict prohibitions or limitations on remarriage, the overarching themes of grace and redemption within Christianity provide a countervailing perspective. Recognizing the complexities of human relationships and the reality of sin, the concepts of mercy and forgiveness become essential considerations in navigating the intricate questions surrounding marital dissolution and subsequent unions.
-
Atonement and Cleansing from Sin
Christian theology emphasizes that through the sacrifice of Jesus Christ, individuals can receive atonement for their sins and experience cleansing from guilt and condemnation. This principle extends to the realm of marital failings and divorce. While divorce is often viewed as a consequence of sin, either by one or both parties involved, the possibility of forgiveness and restoration remains open through genuine repentance and faith. God’s forgiveness does not necessarily erase the consequences of past actions, but it offers a path to healing and a new beginning. A couple divorcing due to infidelity on one spouse’s part might receive forgiveness. However, the marriage is still over, and they will both have to live with the consequences.
-
The Opportunity for Restoration
The concept of God’s mercy extends beyond forgiveness to encompass the possibility of restoration and renewed purpose. While not all marriages can or should be restored, the principle of redemption suggests that individuals who have experienced divorce are not necessarily precluded from finding fulfilling and meaningful relationships in the future. This perspective acknowledges that God’s grace can empower individuals to learn from their past mistakes, grow in character, and build healthy relationships, potentially including a new marriage. A person who was once abusive may genuinely repent and become a kind, loving partner in a future relationship.
-
Balancing Justice and Mercy
Navigating the intersection of divine justice and mercy is critical when considering the issue of remarriage. While the Bible upholds the sanctity of marriage and condemns adultery, it also recognizes the realities of human fallibility and the transformative power of grace. Applying mercy without acknowledging the seriousness of sin can lead to moral relativism. Conversely, applying justice without extending mercy can result in legalism and a failure to recognize the potential for redemption. A balanced approach requires discernment, compassion, and a commitment to both uphold biblical principles and offer hope to those who have experienced marital breakdown. For example, upholding the sanctity of marriage while offering compassion to those who divorced due to domestic violence.
-
Pastoral Care and Discernment
The application of these principles requires careful pastoral care and discernment. Individuals contemplating remarriage after divorce need sensitive guidance that acknowledges the complexities of their situation, encourages self-reflection and accountability, and promotes a deep understanding of biblical teachings on marriage. Pastors and counselors play a crucial role in helping individuals process their past, address any unresolved issues, and seek God’s will for their future. This may involve helping them discern whether remarriage aligns with God’s plan for their lives and whether they are prepared to enter a new relationship with maturity, wisdom, and a commitment to honoring God in their marriage. A pastor might guide a divorced woman to understand her value in God’s eyes, regardless of her marital status, and help her discern if remarriage is the right path for her.
The connection between divine mercy, forgiveness, and the biblical teachings on marriage after divorce underscores the importance of approaching this topic with both theological rigor and pastoral sensitivity. While adhering to biblical principles concerning the sanctity of marriage, it also demands recognizing the transformative power of grace and the potential for healing and restoration in the lives of those who have experienced marital breakdown. This nuanced understanding can guide individuals and faith communities in offering compassionate support, wise counsel, and a message of hope to those navigating the complexities of divorce and remarriage.
5. Covenant and Commitment
The concept of covenant underpins the biblical understanding of marriage, profoundly influencing interpretations regarding divorce and subsequent remarriage. A covenant, in its biblical context, signifies a solemn and binding agreement between two parties, often involving oaths, promises, and mutual obligations. Within the Judeo-Christian tradition, marriage is viewed not merely as a social contract but as a sacred covenant established before God. This covenantal perspective emphasizes the permanence, faithfulness, and unconditional love expected within the marital relationship. The weight given to covenant and commitment shapes the view on the permissibility of dissolving the marriage bond and potentially entering into another covenant. A strong emphasis on the covenantal nature of marriage tends to lead to more restrictive views on divorce and remarriage. For example, denominations that view marriage as an unbreakable covenant often prohibit remarriage except in very limited circumstances or not at all.
The emphasis on commitment reinforces the significance of persevering through difficulties and upholding marital vows, even when faced with challenges. Commitment entails actively working to maintain the relationship, practicing forgiveness, and seeking reconciliation when conflict arises. It suggests that divorce should be considered only as a last resort after all reasonable efforts to preserve the marriage have been exhausted. The biblical narrative provides examples of individuals who demonstrated unwavering commitment to their marriages, even in the face of adversity. Conversely, instances of marital infidelity and broken commitments serve as cautionary tales, illustrating the destructive consequences of neglecting the covenantal obligations. Commitment is exemplified by couples who seek counseling, engage in open communication, and actively work on strengthening their bond rather than immediately resorting to separation when faced with marital problems. The practical significance lies in the encouragement of proactive measures to safeguard the marital covenant, fostering resilience and promoting lifelong fidelity.
Ultimately, the understanding of marriage as a covenant characterized by unwavering commitment significantly shapes perspectives on divorce and remarriage. Recognizing the gravity of the marital covenant encourages a cautious approach to dissolving the union, prioritizing reconciliation and emphasizing the enduring nature of the promises made before God. While interpretations of specific biblical passages concerning divorce and remarriage may vary, the underlying principle of covenantal commitment provides a foundational framework for navigating these complex issues with both theological integrity and pastoral sensitivity. The challenge lies in balancing the ideals of marital permanence with the realities of human fallibility and the potential for grace and redemption in the aftermath of broken covenants.
6. Old Testament Context
Understanding the Old Testament context is indispensable for interpreting biblical perspectives on marital dissolution and subsequent remarriage. The legal and social norms surrounding marriage in ancient Israel differed significantly from contemporary Western views, influencing the regulations and attitudes reflected in Old Testament texts. Specifically, marriage often functioned as a means of ensuring lineage, property inheritance, and social stability. Divorce, while permitted under certain circumstances, carried significant economic and social consequences, particularly for women. Therefore, passages addressing divorce and remarriage must be understood within this framework to grasp their original intent and application. Ignoring this context can lead to misinterpretations and the imposition of modern values onto ancient practices. For example, the practice of levirate marriage (Deuteronomy 25:5-10), requiring a man to marry his deceased brother’s widow to continue his lineage, is incomprehensible without understanding its socio-cultural context.
Several key Old Testament passages inform the broader discussion on remarriage. Deuteronomy 24:1-4, as previously discussed, sets limitations on a divorced woman’s ability to remarry her first husband after marrying another man. This regulation, potentially aimed at protecting women from exploitation, must be viewed against the backdrop of a patriarchal society where women’s rights were limited. Furthermore, the prevalence of polygamy in the Old Testament, although not explicitly endorsed, provides a contrast to the New Testament emphasis on monogamy, impacting interpretations of marital fidelity and the consequences of divorce. David’s multiple marriages and the complex family dynamics described in the books of Samuel and Kings provide cautionary examples and highlight the challenges of maintaining marital harmony. The practical significance lies in recognizing that these Old Testament regulations were tailored to a specific time and culture, and their direct application to modern relationships requires careful discernment.
In conclusion, analyzing Old Testament passages concerning divorce and remarriage without considering their historical, cultural, and legal context is fraught with peril. A nuanced understanding of the social structures, economic realities, and patriarchal norms of ancient Israel is essential for accurately interpreting these texts and discerning their relevance to contemporary discussions. The Old Testament provides valuable insights into the complexities of marriage and the challenges of human relationships, but its teachings must be understood within their original setting to avoid misinterpretations and ensure responsible application in the modern world. Balancing the timeless principles of faithfulness and covenant with the evolving social contexts in which relationships exist remains a crucial task.
7. Differing Interpretations
The varied interpretations of scriptural passages regarding divorce and remarriage form the crux of the ongoing debate surrounding the biblical stance on this topic. Divergent understandings of key verses, particularly those in the Gospels and Paul’s epistles, directly influence the conclusions drawn about the permissibility and conditions of remarriage after marital dissolution. These differences are not merely semantic but reflect fundamental theological and hermeneutical approaches to interpreting the Bible.
-
The “Exception Clause” in Matthew 19:9
One of the most significant points of divergence centers on the interpretation of the “exception clause” in Matthew 19:9, which states, “whoever divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another, commits adultery.” Some interpret porneia (translated as “sexual immorality”) narrowly, referring only to pre-marital sexual relations discovered after marriage, thus limiting the allowance for divorce and remarriage. Others understand porneia more broadly to encompass various forms of sexual sin, including adultery, thereby expanding the grounds for permissible divorce and subsequent remarriage. These varying interpretations directly impact whether a divorced individual is considered scripturally free to remarry.
-
The Meaning of “Desertion” in 1 Corinthians 7
1 Corinthians 7:15 addresses situations where a non-believing spouse chooses to leave a marriage with a believing spouse. The passage states that in such cases, the believer is “not under bondage.” Some interpret this to mean that the believer is free to remarry, as the marital bond has been broken by the non-believer’s departure. Others argue that this freedom only applies to the obligation to remain in the marriage, not to the freedom to remarry, asserting that the marital bond remains intact despite the desertion. The interpretation of “not under bondage” significantly affects the perceived options available to the abandoned spouse.
-
Literal vs. Contextual Interpretation
Another point of divergence lies in the method of interpreting biblical texts. Some advocate for a literal interpretation, adhering strictly to the explicit wording of the scriptures. This approach often leads to more restrictive views on divorce and remarriage, emphasizing the permanence of the marital covenant. Others favor a contextual interpretation, considering the historical, cultural, and social context in which the scriptures were written. This approach may lead to a more nuanced understanding of the scriptures, taking into account the specific circumstances and challenges faced by the original audience. A literal interpretation of “what God has joined together, let no one separate” might prohibit all divorce, while a contextual reading might consider situations involving abuse or abandonment.
-
Emphasis on Law vs. Grace
Differing theological perspectives regarding the balance between law and grace also contribute to varying interpretations. Some emphasize the importance of adhering to the Law, viewing marriage as a binding contract with strict consequences for its violation. This perspective often results in a stricter stance on divorce and remarriage. Others emphasize the importance of grace and forgiveness, recognizing the realities of human sin and the possibility of redemption and new beginnings. This perspective may lead to a more lenient approach, acknowledging that divorce, while not ideal, may be permissible in certain circumstances and that individuals can find healing and fulfillment in remarriage. Denominations emphasizing grace may be more accepting of remarriage after divorce compared to those emphasizing strict adherence to perceived legalistic interpretations of scripture.
These differing interpretations underscore the complexity of determining a single, universally accepted answer to the question of the Bible’s stance on remarriage after divorce. The various approaches to interpreting scripture, the nuanced meanings of key terms, and the differing theological perspectives all contribute to the ongoing debate. Ultimately, individuals and faith communities must grapple with these complexities, seeking to understand the scriptures within their historical and theological context while also applying principles of grace, mercy, and pastoral sensitivity to those navigating the challenges of marital dissolution and the possibility of remarriage.
Frequently Asked Questions
The issue of remarriage after divorce is a complex and often debated topic within Christian theology. The following questions and answers offer insights into common inquiries and considerations regarding biblical viewpoints on this subject.
Question 1: Does the Bible explicitly forbid all remarriage after divorce?
No, the Bible does not contain a universally agreed-upon explicit prohibition of remarriage in all circumstances. Interpretations vary, with some focusing on the permanence of the marriage covenant and others acknowledging exceptions based on specific scriptural passages and theological principles.
Question 2: What is the significance of Matthew 19:9 in the discussion of remarriage?
Matthew 19:9 contains what is often termed the “exception clause,” allowing for divorce in cases of “sexual immorality” ( porneia). Interpretations differ on whether this clause also permits remarriage, and on the precise definition of porneia itself.
Question 3: How does 1 Corinthians 7 inform the understanding of remarriage after divorce?
1 Corinthians 7 provides guidance on separation and reconciliation, particularly in situations involving believers and non-believers. Some interpret the passage as permitting remarriage for a believer who has been abandoned by a non-believing spouse.
Question 4: What role do grace and forgiveness play in considering remarriage after divorce?
The Christian doctrines of grace and forgiveness offer a counterpoint to legalistic interpretations of scripture. Genuine repentance and faith can lead to atonement for sins related to marital breakdown, potentially opening the door to restoration and new beginnings, including remarriage.
Question 5: How does the Old Testament inform contemporary views on remarriage after divorce?
The Old Testament provides a historical and cultural context for understanding marriage and divorce practices in ancient Israel. Regulations found in Deuteronomy, for example, must be interpreted in light of their specific social and legal setting, rather than directly applied to modern relationships without careful consideration.
Question 6: Why are there so many different interpretations of the Bible’s teachings on remarriage?
Differing interpretations arise from various factors, including varying hermeneutical approaches (literal vs. contextual), theological perspectives (emphasis on law vs. grace), and understandings of key terms and passages. These differences reflect the complexity of the subject and the ongoing theological debate surrounding it.
In summary, the biblical perspective on remarriage following divorce is a multifaceted issue with no single, universally accepted answer. Careful study of relevant scriptures, consideration of historical and cultural contexts, and an understanding of theological principles are essential for navigating this complex topic.
The following section will explore specific denominational stances on this issue.
Navigating “What Does the Bible Say About Marriage After Divorce”
Understanding scriptural perspectives on marriage following dissolution requires diligent study and prayerful reflection. These tips offer guidance for navigating this complex subject with intellectual honesty and spiritual discernment.
Tip 1: Study Relevant Passages in Context: Do not isolate verses. Interpret scriptures such as Matthew 19:9, 1 Corinthians 7, and Deuteronomy 24:1-4 within their historical, cultural, and literary contexts. Consider the original audience, the author’s intent, and the broader themes of the biblical narrative.
Tip 2: Consider Multiple Interpretations: Acknowledge the diversity of theological viewpoints on this topic. Engage with different interpretations offered by reputable biblical scholars and theologians across various Christian traditions. Understand the rationale behind each perspective before forming a conclusion.
Tip 3: Define Key Terms Carefully: Pay close attention to the original Greek and Hebrew terms used in relevant passages. For instance, the meaning of porneia in Matthew 19:9 is crucial. Consult lexicons and commentaries to gain a comprehensive understanding of the nuances of these terms.
Tip 4: Examine Denominational Positions: Research the official stances of different Christian denominations on divorce and remarriage. Understand the theological frameworks and scriptural interpretations that inform their positions. Consider the implications for personal belief and practice.
Tip 5: Prioritize Pastoral Sensitivity: Recognize the emotional and spiritual complexities involved in divorce and remarriage. Approach this topic with empathy, compassion, and a commitment to providing support and guidance to those affected by marital breakdown. Discernment and wisdom are essential.
Tip 6: Seek Wise Counsel: Engage in conversations with trusted pastors, counselors, or spiritual mentors who possess a deep understanding of scripture and a commitment to providing biblically sound advice. Weigh their counsel carefully and seek guidance through prayer.
Tip 7: Emphasize Grace and Forgiveness: Remember that the overarching message of the Bible is one of grace, forgiveness, and redemption. While upholding the sanctity of marriage, also recognize the reality of human fallibility and the potential for new beginnings through faith in Jesus Christ.
These considerations highlight the importance of engaging with scripture responsibly and seeking to understand God’s will for marriage in a way that is both faithful to the biblical text and sensitive to the complexities of human experience.
The subsequent sections will provide additional resources for further study and reflection on this important topic.
Conclusion
The preceding exploration of biblical texts pertaining to “what does the bible say about marriage after divorce” reveals a complex and nuanced landscape of interpretation. Key passages in Deuteronomy, Matthew, 1 Corinthians, and others present varying perspectives on the permissibility of marital dissolution and subsequent unions. Interpretations diverge significantly based on hermeneutical approaches, theological frameworks, and understandings of cultural contexts. The weight given to the covenantal nature of marriage, the definition of specific terms, and the balance between law and grace contribute to the ongoing discourse on this subject.
Ultimately, determining a definitive answer to “what does the bible say about marriage after divorce” requires careful consideration of the totality of scripture, responsible engagement with diverse theological viewpoints, and sensitivity to the individual circumstances of those navigating marital challenges. Continued study, prayerful reflection, and reliance on wise counsel remain essential for discerning God’s will and applying biblical principles with both integrity and compassion.
