The biblical texts offer varying perspectives on the acceptability of entering a second marriage following the dissolution of a prior marital union. Several passages address the issue of divorce and its implications for future relationships, leading to diverse interpretations within different Christian traditions. These interpretations often hinge on the specific grounds for the initial separation and the subsequent status of the individuals involved.
Understanding the historical and cultural context in which these scriptures were written is crucial. Marriage in ancient times served not only as a personal commitment but also as a social and economic institution. Considerations regarding lineage, property rights, and societal stability heavily influenced perspectives on divorce and subsequent marital unions. Consequently, biblical pronouncements must be viewed within the framework of those specific historical circumstances to fully grasp their intended meaning and application.
The subsequent sections will explore key biblical passages related to divorce and remarriage, examining the range of interpretations offered by different theological viewpoints. The goal is to provide a comprehensive overview of the complexities surrounding this topic, allowing for a more informed understanding of the various perspectives and considerations involved when interpreting scriptural guidance on this sensitive issue.
1. Adultery as Grounds
The presence of marital infidelity, specifically adultery, is a focal point in discussions regarding the scriptural permissibility of remarriage following a divorce. Certain interpretations of biblical texts cite adultery as a potential justification for divorce, which then opens the question of whether remarriage is permitted for the aggrieved party.
-
Matthew 19:9 Interpretation
Matthew 19:9 states, “And I say to you: whoever divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another, commits adultery.” Some interpret this verse as permitting divorce and subsequent remarriage in cases where adultery has occurred. The injured spouse, in this view, is released from the marital bond due to the unfaithfulness of the other. However, other interpretations suggest this verse solely addresses the initial divorce and not the right to remarry.
-
Moral Implications for the Offending Party
The impact of adultery extends beyond the immediate dissolution of the marriage; it raises questions regarding the moral standing of the offending party. Some theological perspectives hold that the adulterous spouse has broken the marital covenant so completely that remarriage for them is not permissible, unless reconciliation with the original spouse occurs. This viewpoint often emphasizes the importance of repentance and seeking forgiveness.
-
Old Testament Precedents
The Old Testament contains passages concerning adultery and its consequences, primarily within the legal framework of the Mosaic Law. While the Old Testament does not directly address remarriage following divorce due to adultery in explicit terms, its condemnation of adultery as a serious offense informs interpretations concerning the sanctity of marriage and the repercussions of infidelity. These historical contexts shed light on the gravity with which adultery was viewed.
-
Varying Denominational Views
Different Christian denominations hold varying stances on this issue. Some denominations permit remarriage after divorce due to adultery, viewing it as a legitimate exception, while others maintain a stricter position, prohibiting remarriage under any circumstances, even in cases of infidelity. These diverse perspectives reflect different interpretations of the relevant biblical passages and the application of theological principles.
Ultimately, the acceptance of adultery as valid grounds for divorce and subsequent remarriage remains a complex theological issue. While some interpretations support this view based on specific scriptural passages, other considerations, such as the moral implications for both parties and the broader biblical teachings on marriage and forgiveness, contribute to the ongoing debate within Christian theology. The interpretation ultimately determines the applicability of these verses in the lives of believers navigating the complexities and pains of a broken marriage.
2. Desertion by Unbeliever
The concept of desertion by an unbelieving spouse, sometimes referred to as the “Pauline Privilege,” enters the discussion regarding the permissibility of entering a new marriage after the dissolution of a prior union. It stems from a specific passage in the New Testament and offers a potential exception to general pronouncements concerning the permanence of marriage.
-
1 Corinthians 7:15 Interpretation
1 Corinthians 7:15 states, “But if the unbelieving partner separates, let it be so. In such cases the brother or sister is not enslaved. God has called you to peace.” This verse is often interpreted to mean that if an unbelieving spouse chooses to leave a marriage with a believing spouse, the believer is not bound to remain in the marriage. The phrase “not enslaved” is understood by some to mean the believer is free to divorce and potentially remarry.
-
Conditions for Application
The application of this principle is conditional. The desertion must originate from the unbelieving spouse; the believer cannot initiate the separation based solely on the other partner’s lack of faith. Furthermore, genuine attempts at reconciliation should be made by the believer before considering the marriage irreparably broken. The decision to separate must be the clear and persistent choice of the unbelieving partner.
-
Differing Theological Views
Interpretations of 1 Corinthians 7:15 vary among different theological traditions. Some emphasize the “peace” mentioned in the verse, arguing that God desires the believer’s well-being and freedom from a contentious relationship. Others take a more restrictive view, suggesting that while the believer is not obligated to prevent the desertion, they are not necessarily granted the right to remarry, emphasizing the lifelong commitment inherent in the marriage covenant. Some views argue that the deserted partner is not enslaved only to the relationship, but still married to the other party.
-
Impact on Remarriage
For those interpretations that accept the permissibility of remarriage in cases of desertion by an unbeliever, the key factor is the involuntary nature of the separation for the believer. The believer is seen as the victim of the other spouse’s choice and is therefore not held responsible for the dissolution of the marriage in the same way as if they had initiated the separation or committed adultery. However, the decision to remarry still warrants careful consideration and prayerful discernment.
The concept of desertion by an unbeliever provides a nuanced layer to the discussions surrounding the potential for new marital unions following the end of a prior one. The interpretation of relevant scriptures, specifically 1 Corinthians 7:15, is crucial in determining its applicability. It underscores the complexity of applying scriptural principles to specific real-life situations, highlighting the necessity for careful theological reflection and personal discernment when faced with the challenges of marital breakdown.
3. Forgiveness and Grace
Forgiveness and grace constitute essential elements within the framework of biblical teachings on marital dissolution and the possibility of remarriage. While specific scriptures may address the permissibility of ending a marriage under certain conditions, the underlying principles of forgiveness and grace present a broader ethical and spiritual context. The application of forgiveness, both towards oneself and one’s former spouse, holds significant weight in discerning a path forward after divorce.
The absence of forgiveness can impede healing and spiritual growth, potentially leading to bitterness and resentment. Biblical teachings emphasize the importance of extending forgiveness, mirroring the forgiveness offered by God. This does not necessarily negate the consequences of actions that led to the divorce, but it provides a pathway towards reconciliation with God and others. Grace, understood as unmerited favor, also plays a critical role. Even when human relationships are fractured, divine grace offers the potential for restoration and new beginnings. This understanding can be particularly relevant when considering the complex factors that contribute to the breakdown of a marriage.
The role of forgiveness and grace in navigating decisions regarding potential remarriage is multifaceted. For individuals who have been divorced, embracing forgiveness can lead to greater clarity and discernment regarding future relationships. It helps to avoid repeating past mistakes and allows one to approach a potential new marriage with a healed heart. The practical significance of this understanding lies in the ability to move forward with genuine hope and a commitment to building healthy relationships, grounded in principles of love, respect, and mutual understanding. This framework acknowledges the complexities of human relationships and offers a path toward healing and renewal, even after the painful experience of divorce.
4. “One flesh” concept
The “one flesh” concept, originating in Genesis 2:24, is a foundational element in the biblical understanding of marriage. Its implications are frequently considered when interpreting scriptural passages concerning the potential for entering a new marriage after a prior marital union has been dissolved.
-
Genesis 2:24 Interpretation
Genesis 2:24 states, “Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall become one flesh.” This passage is understood to indicate that marriage creates a unique and indissoluble union between a man and a woman. This union transcends physical intimacy and involves a deep spiritual and emotional connection. Therefore, some interpret this “one flesh” union as remaining intact even after legal divorce, thus precluding remarriage.
-
Indissolubility of Marriage
The “one flesh” concept often underpins the argument that marriage is intended to be a lifelong commitment. This perspective maintains that the bond created at marriage is not easily broken, even when legal separation occurs. Some interpretations suggest that only death can dissolve the “one flesh” union, making remarriage during the lifetime of the former spouse a violation of the original marital covenant. This viewpoint emphasizes the sanctity and permanence of the marital bond.
-
Spiritual Implications
The spiritual implications of the “one flesh” concept extend beyond the physical and emotional dimensions of marriage. Some theological perspectives emphasize that marriage mirrors the relationship between Christ and the Church, a union characterized by unwavering love and commitment. Breaking the “one flesh” bond through divorce, and subsequent remarriage, can therefore be viewed as a disruption of this spiritual analogy. Considerations of repentance, forgiveness, and reconciliation often play a significant role in navigating these spiritual complexities.
-
Exceptions and Interpretations
While the “one flesh” concept supports the view that marriage is intended to be permanent, certain interpretations allow for exceptions in cases of adultery or abandonment. These exceptions are often based on specific scriptural passages that address these circumstances. Even within these exceptions, however, the gravity of breaking the “one flesh” bond is acknowledged, and remarriage is not entered into lightly. The weight of this concept necessitates careful consideration of the moral, spiritual, and emotional consequences for all parties involved.
The “one flesh” concept introduces a profound dimension to the dialogue surrounding the potential for subsequent marital unions following divorce. Emphasizing the permanence of the initial bond, this understanding impacts perspectives across various theological viewpoints. This concept often contributes to the conservative views of “what does the bible say about remarriage after a divorce.”
5. Differing interpretations
The existence of disparate interpretations surrounding scriptures on divorce and remarriage constitutes a central facet of understanding the question. Divergent readings of specific verses, such as those found in Matthew 19 and 1 Corinthians 7, directly lead to varying conclusions regarding the permissibility of entering a subsequent marital union after a divorce. The effect is a landscape of contrasting theological positions on this complex issue. Without recognizing the role of varying interpretations, a comprehensive grasp of the debate surrounding the topic is unattainable. For example, one denomination may view Matthew 19:9 as granting an exception for remarriage in cases of adultery, while another denomination may understand the verse as pertaining only to the initial act of divorce, thereby prohibiting subsequent remarriage.
The importance of differing interpretations is further amplified by the historical and cultural contexts in which biblical texts were written. Modern readers often apply their own cultural and societal norms to these ancient writings, potentially leading to misinterpretations of the original intent. A real-life illustration of this is the application of “Pauline Privilege”. One interpretation supports remarriage if an unbelieving spouse leaves, while others believe that the deserted partner is not enslaved only to the relationship, but still married to the other party. Therefore, recognition of varying interpretations highlights the need for careful exegesis, considering the original language, historical setting, and the author’s intended audience. Furthermore, differing understandings of key theological concepts, such as the nature of marriage, the meaning of covenant, and the role of forgiveness, significantly influence perspectives on the legitimacy of remarriage.
In summary, the phenomenon of differing interpretations is fundamental to the complexities surrounding the question. These diverse readings stem from variations in theological perspectives, applications of historical context, and the understanding of key biblical principles. Recognizing and acknowledging these differences is essential for a thorough comprehension of the debate. Without considering these factors, any conclusion on the issue would be incomplete and potentially misinformed. The challenge lies in navigating these disparate interpretations with humility, acknowledging the complexity of scripture and seeking wisdom from trusted sources within the Christian community.
6. Jesus’ Teachings
Jesus’ pronouncements on divorce and remarriage, primarily recorded in the Gospels, constitute a crucial component of the broader biblical perspective on this issue. His teachings, often presented in response to specific questions or challenges from religious leaders, offer a unique lens through which to understand the complexities and nuances surrounding marital dissolution and the potential for subsequent unions. A central aspect of his teachings emphasizes the original intent of marriage as a lifelong covenant, established by God in creation. This perspective highlights the seriousness with which marital vows should be regarded and the potential consequences of dissolving the marital bond. For example, in Matthew 19, when questioned about the permissibility of divorce “for any cause,” Jesus refers back to the creation narrative, stating that God “made them male and female” and that “a man shall leave his father and mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall become one flesh.” This appeal to the original design underscores the permanence and sacredness of marriage in the divine plan.
Furthermore, Jesus addresses the issue of adultery in connection with divorce and remarriage, adding another layer of complexity to the discussion. In Matthew 5:32, he states that “anyone who divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, makes her the victim of adultery, and anyone who marries a divorced woman commits adultery.” This statement has been subject to various interpretations, with some understanding it to mean that adultery is the only legitimate ground for divorce and that remarriage after divorce is permissible only for the innocent party in such cases. However, other interpretations suggest that Jesus’ primary focus is on the moral culpability of the individual initiating the divorce, regardless of the grounds. Practical application of Jesus’ teaching can often be difficult and painful. For example, a woman divorced for no biblical reason finds herself in a difficult circumstance when attempting to date, knowing Jesus said, “anyone who marries a divorced woman commits adultery. These circumstances often lead to much prayer, counseling, and contemplation of this teaching.
In summary, Jesus’ teachings on divorce and remarriage provide a challenging and nuanced perspective on the issue. While emphasizing the importance of marital fidelity and the original intent of marriage as a lifelong commitment, his words have been interpreted in various ways, leading to differing theological viewpoints. The challenges of interpreting and applying these teachings to specific real-life situations highlight the need for careful consideration, prayerful discernment, and guidance from trusted sources within the Christian community. A thorough understanding of Jesus’ words, within their historical and cultural context, is essential for anyone seeking to navigate the complexities of divorce and remarriage with integrity and faithfulness to biblical principles.
7. Pauline privilege
The concept of “Pauline privilege,” derived primarily from 1 Corinthians 7:12-16, constitutes a specific element within the broader discussion of scriptural perspectives on subsequent marital unions after divorce. The interpretation of this passage directly impacts the conclusions one draws regarding the permissibility of entering a new marriage after the dissolution of a previous one. Specifically, “Pauline privilege” addresses situations where one spouse is a believer and the other is not, and the unbelieving spouse chooses to depart from the marriage. This departure, or desertion, raises the question of whether the believing spouse is then free to remarry.
The importance of this concept lies in its potential to provide an exception to more general pronouncements about the permanence of marriage. While many interpret the Bible as upholding the ideal of marriage as a lifelong commitment, the “Pauline privilege” suggests that under specific circumstances namely, desertion by an unbelieving spouse the believer is “not bound.” This phrase is often understood to mean that the believer is no longer obligated to remain in the marriage and, consequently, may be free to divorce and remarry. A real-life example would be a Christian woman married to an atheist who abandons her and the marriage because of her faith. According to some interpretations of “Pauline privilege,” this woman would be free to remarry, as she was not the one who initiated the divorce and the desertion was due to her faith. However, it’s essential to note that the application of “Pauline privilege” is not without conditions. The desertion must originate from the unbelieving spouse, and the believer should have made reasonable attempts to preserve the marriage. The unbelieving spouse’s departure must be clear and unambiguous.
The practical significance of understanding “Pauline privilege” lies in its implications for individuals navigating the complexities of interfaith marriages and potential divorce. It offers a framework for interpreting scripture in light of specific circumstances, providing guidance and potentially offering a path towards remarriage for those who believe they have been abandoned because of their faith. This, however, needs to be pursued with prayer and wisdom. The implications of divorce are not easy to work though alone. It also provides an example of how the bible can have multiple interpreations. The integration of “Pauline privilege” into the broader understanding of divorce and subsequent marital unions requires careful consideration of other scriptural passages, theological principles, and individual circumstances. The ultimate decision regarding remarriage rests with the individual, guided by their conscience, prayer, and counsel from trusted spiritual advisors.
8. Old Testament context
The Old Testament provides a foundational backdrop for understanding perspectives on marital dissolution and subsequent unions. Although the New Testament offers direct teachings, the Old Testament establishes cultural norms, legal frameworks, and theological concepts that influenced perspectives on marriage, divorce, and remarriage within ancient Israel.
-
Mosaic Law and Divorce
The Mosaic Law, particularly Deuteronomy 24:1-4, addresses divorce practices in ancient Israel. This passage regulates the process by which a man could divorce his wife if she found “no favor in his eyes because he has found some indecency in her.” While this passage doesn’t explicitly endorse divorce, it acknowledges its existence and seeks to regulate it. The provision that a divorced woman who remarries and is later divorced or widowed cannot return to her first husband suggests a finality to the initial divorce, though not necessarily a prohibition of all remarriage. The “indecency” clause opened the possibility of divorce on grounds other than adultery.
-
Patriarchal Society and Women’s Rights
The Old Testament reflects a patriarchal society where women possessed limited rights and were often viewed as the property of their fathers or husbands. Divorce, therefore, was largely at the discretion of the husband. This context influences interpretations of remarriage, particularly regarding the status and options available to divorced women. Remarriage could have been a means of economic survival and social stability for a divorced woman. The perspective on the woman’s right to remarry is often tied to the economic realities for women during this time.
-
Prophetic Condemnation of Unjust Divorce
While the Mosaic Law regulated divorce, some prophets condemned the practice, particularly when driven by unjust or selfish motives. Malachi 2:16 states, “‘I hate divorce,’ says the Lord God of Israel.” This prophetic condemnation adds a moral dimension to the discussion, highlighting the potential for abuse within the legal framework and underscoring God’s desire for marital fidelity. It demonstrates that while divorce was permitted, it was not necessarily condoned. Although the old testament regulated and provided for divorce, it didn’t mean that it was something that God looked favorably upon.
-
Levirate Marriage and Lineage Preservation
The concept of levirate marriage, outlined in Deuteronomy 25:5-10, provides another layer of complexity. This law stipulates that if a man dies without leaving a son, his brother is obligated to marry the widow and produce an heir to carry on the deceased brother’s name. While not directly related to divorce, levirate marriage highlights the importance of lineage and family continuity within Old Testament society. It reveals that societal concerns about inheritance and family name could sometimes supersede individual preferences in matters of marriage.
The Old Testament presents a multifaceted view of marriage and divorce, reflecting the social, legal, and religious norms of ancient Israel. Its laws, narratives, and prophetic pronouncements contribute to the ongoing discussion, providing background for understanding the context in which New Testament teachings on marriage and remarriage emerged. Ignoring the realities and the perspectives found in the Old Testament will cause a misunderstanding of views about divorce.
Frequently Asked Questions
This section addresses common inquiries and misconceptions regarding scriptural perspectives on remarriage following the dissolution of a prior marital union. The aim is to provide clear and informative answers based on established biblical interpretations.
Question 1: Does the Bible explicitly permit remarriage after divorce?
The Bible does not offer a universally agreed-upon, unambiguous answer. Certain passages, notably Matthew 19:9, are interpreted by some to permit remarriage in cases of adultery. Other interpretations emphasize the lifelong nature of marriage, suggesting remarriage is permissible only after the death of a spouse.
Question 2: What is the “Pauline Privilege” and how does it relate to remarriage?
The “Pauline Privilege,” found in 1 Corinthians 7:12-16, addresses situations where an unbelieving spouse deserts a believing spouse. Some interpretations suggest that the believer is “not bound” in such cases and may be free to remarry. However, this interpretation is not universally accepted.
Question 3: Does adultery automatically grant the right to remarry?
While some interpretations of Matthew 19:9 suggest that adultery provides grounds for divorce and subsequent remarriage, other viewpoints maintain that adultery may justify divorce but does not necessarily confer the right to remarry. Differing denominational stances contribute to this varied understanding.
Question 4: Does the Old Testament offer any guidance on remarriage after divorce?
The Old Testament acknowledges the existence of divorce (Deuteronomy 24:1-4) but does not directly address the permissibility of remarriage in all circumstances. The patriarchal context of the Old Testament influences interpretations concerning the rights and options available to divorced women.
Question 5: Is forgiveness a factor to be considered when contemplating remarriage after divorce?
The principles of forgiveness and grace are central to Christian teachings. While forgiveness does not negate the consequences of past actions, it enables healing and spiritual growth. Embracing forgiveness can inform one’s approach to future relationships and the decision to remarry.
Question 6: How do different Christian denominations view remarriage after divorce?
Christian denominations hold diverse perspectives on this issue. Some denominations permit remarriage after divorce in specific circumstances, such as adultery or abandonment, while others maintain a stricter stance, prohibiting remarriage under any conditions. These differing views reflect varying interpretations of scripture and theological principles.
In conclusion, the biblical perspective on remarriage following divorce remains a complex and debated topic. The interpretation of key scriptures, historical context, and theological considerations all contribute to the range of viewpoints held within the Christian faith.
The final section will provide a summary of key considerations and guidelines for navigating the complexities surrounding this topic.
Navigating the Complexities
The following points offer guidance for individuals grappling with the question of remarriage after marital dissolution. These suggestions are rooted in common interpretations of relevant scriptures.
Tip 1: Seek Counsel: Consult with trusted pastors, theologians, or counselors who possess a deep understanding of biblical perspectives on marriage, divorce, and remarriage. Their expertise can offer valuable insight and guidance.
Tip 2: Study Scripture: Engage in thorough study of relevant biblical passages, considering the historical context, original language, and various interpretations. This will enable a more informed understanding of the issues.
Tip 3: Engage in Prayerful Discernment: Approach the decision with prayerful contemplation, seeking God’s guidance and wisdom. Allow time for reflection and spiritual discernment.
Tip 4: Examine Motivations: Carefully consider the underlying motivations for desiring remarriage. Ensure that the decision is driven by a genuine desire for companionship and a commitment to a healthy, biblically-sound relationship, rather than solely by loneliness or other external pressures.
Tip 5: Understand Scriptural Grounds: Be aware of the different interpretations regarding scriptural grounds for divorce and their implications for remarriage. Consider whether the specific circumstances of the previous divorce align with these interpretations.
Tip 6: Address Past Issues: Prior to considering remarriage, address any unresolved issues from the previous marriage, including personal failings, patterns of behavior, and any need for forgiveness or reconciliation.
Tip 7: Prioritize Healing: Allow adequate time for emotional and spiritual healing following the divorce. Entering a new relationship prematurely can hinder the healing process and negatively impact the new marriage.
These guidelines emphasize the necessity of careful consideration, spiritual discernment, and reliance on trusted counsel when navigating the complexities surrounding remarriage after marital dissolution. Seeking understanding will help clarify the path ahead.
The upcoming concluding section will summarize the entirety of the information above.
Conclusion
The exploration of what the bible says about remarriage after a divorce reveals a spectrum of interpretations, grounded in specific scriptures and shaped by varying theological viewpoints. Key points include the consideration of adultery and desertion by an unbelieving spouse as potential grounds for divorce, the importance of forgiveness and grace, and the enduring “one flesh” concept. Differing understandings of these elements lead to diverse conclusions regarding the permissibility of entering a new marriage. Interpretations of Jesus’ teachings, the Pauline Privilege, and the Old Testament context further contribute to the complexity.
Given the multifaceted nature of this topic, individuals navigating these circumstances are encouraged to engage in diligent scriptural study, seek counsel from trusted spiritual advisors, and approach the decision with prayerful discernment. The weight of these decisions warrants careful consideration of the potential implications, ensuring that any action aligns with deeply held beliefs and a commitment to biblical principles.
