Determining the fair market worth of a privately held company is a critical process when marital assets are being divided. This assessment, often required during the dissolution of a marriage, aims to establish an objective monetary figure for the business, taking into account its assets, liabilities, and projected future earnings. As an example, if one spouse owns a successful restaurant, experts will evaluate the restaurant’s financial statements, market position, and tangible assets to arrive at a justifiable valuation.
The accurate quantification of a businesss value is paramount for equitable distribution of property and can significantly impact settlement negotiations and court decisions. Historically, differing methodologies and interpretations of financial data have led to disputes; however, established guidelines and professional standards have improved the reliability and consistency of these analyses, promoting fairer outcomes. The process ensures that both parties are aware of the business’s true economic standing.
Understanding the various appraisal methods employed, the role of expert witnesses, and the legal considerations involved is essential. Therefore, the following discussion will delve into the key factors influencing this determination, potential challenges that may arise, and strategies for navigating these complex situations successfully.
1. Fair Market Value
Fair Market Value is the cornerstone of assessing a businesss worth during divorce proceedings. It represents the price at which an asset would change hands between a willing buyer and a willing seller when neither is under any compulsion to buy or sell, both having reasonable knowledge of relevant facts. This concept aims to establish an objective and unbiased valuation for equitable distribution of marital assets.
-
Defining “Willing Buyer and Seller” in Divorce
In the context of divorce, the “willing buyer” and “willing seller” are hypothetical parties acting independently and rationally. This means neither spouse is compelled to accept an unfavorable deal due to emotional or financial pressure from the divorce. The concept requires that both parties have ample time to consider the transaction, mirroring arm’s-length negotiations. For example, if one spouse desperately needs cash, their “willingness” might be compromised, leading to an undervaluation. This necessitates careful scrutiny to ensure the hypothetical remains realistic and fair.
-
The Role of “Reasonable Knowledge”
Establishing Fair Market Value requires that both the hypothetical buyer and seller possess “reasonable knowledge of relevant facts” about the business. This includes financial statements, market conditions, competitive landscape, and any other factors affecting its potential profitability. An information asymmetry, where one spouse has significantly more insight into the business’s operation than the other, undermines the fairness of the valuation. For instance, if the operating spouse conceals a major contract loss, the uninformed spouse’s valuation will be inaccurate and detrimental to equitable division.
-
Impact of “No Compulsion to Buy or Sell”
The “no compulsion” element of Fair Market Value aims to eliminate any pressure or distress impacting the valuation. During divorce, emotions often run high, and one spouse might feel forced to sell their business interest for less than its true value to expedite the proceedings. This is particularly relevant when one spouse is heavily reliant on the business’s income. A court or valuation expert will need to assess if duress is influencing one party’s acceptance of a lower valuation, ensuring the final figure aligns with a truly voluntary transaction.
-
The Importance of Objectivity and Impartiality
Fair Market Value ensures a fair and unbiased appraisal when dividing assets. It demands objectivity from the evaluator, removing personal biases or favoritism towards either party. For example, an appraiser should not inflate or deflate the value to favor the spouse who hired them. Independence and transparency are crucial to uphold integrity, contributing to an agreement accepted by all. If objectivity is questioned, requesting an independent expert can resolve concerns and prevent further disputes.
These multifaceted aspects of Fair Market Value collectively safeguard the equitable division of marital assets when a business is involved in divorce proceedings. By adhering to these principles, courts aim to ensure that both parties receive a just settlement based on an accurate and unbiased representation of the business’s economic reality.
2. Appraisal Methodologies
The selection and application of appropriate appraisal methodologies are central to determining the accurate value of a business during divorce proceedings. Different methods can yield varying results, and the choice often depends on the nature of the business, the availability of reliable data, and the specific legal jurisdiction.
-
Asset-Based Approach
This approach focuses on the net asset value of the business, subtracting liabilities from assets. It is particularly relevant for asset-intensive businesses, such as real estate holding companies or manufacturing firms with substantial equipment. For instance, if a construction company owns land, buildings, and heavy machinery, the asset-based approach would quantify these tangible assets and deduct any outstanding debts. In divorce cases, this provides a baseline value, but it may not fully reflect the business’s earning potential as a going concern.
-
Income-Based Approach
This method emphasizes the future earnings capacity of the business. Discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis is a common technique, projecting future revenues and expenses and discounting them back to present value. Capitalization of earnings is another method, dividing the business’s earnings by a capitalization rate. For example, a successful consulting firm with stable revenue streams would be well-suited for income-based valuation. In divorce, this approach considers the business’s ability to generate income for the owning spouse, thus affecting spousal support and property division.
-
Market-Based Approach
This approach relies on comparing the business to similar businesses that have been recently sold or are publicly traded. Multiples of revenue, earnings, or EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization) are derived from these comparable companies and applied to the subject business. For example, valuing a local bakery could involve analyzing the sale prices of comparable bakeries in the region. In divorce, this method provides a reality check, grounding the valuation in actual market transactions, although finding truly comparable businesses can be challenging.
-
The Hybrid Approach
Sometimes, a business valuation in divorce context involves using a mix of the aforementioned methods. This approach takes into account a range of considerations, combining the strengths of each method. For example, a family-owned manufacturing business might use the asset-based approach to value its real estate holdings and the income-based approach to estimate potential revenue in the coming years.
The judicious selection and application of appraisal methodologies are critical in establishing a defensible and equitable business valuation during divorce. The valuation expert must provide a clear rationale for the chosen methods and address any potential limitations to ensure a fair outcome for both parties.
3. Financial Statements
Accurate and comprehensive financial statements are foundational to the business valuation process during divorce proceedings. These documents provide the raw data necessary for applying various valuation methodologies and form the basis for expert opinions regarding the business’s worth.
-
Balance Sheet Analysis
The balance sheet offers a snapshot of a company’s assets, liabilities, and equity at a specific point in time. Analyzing this statement is crucial for understanding the business’s net worth and financial stability. For instance, overstated asset values or hidden liabilities can significantly skew valuation results, potentially harming one party in the divorce settlement. Scrutinizing accounts receivable, inventory, and long-term debt is essential for ensuring the balance sheet accurately reflects the business’s financial position.
-
Income Statement Scrutiny
The income statement, also known as the profit and loss statement, reveals a company’s financial performance over a specific period. Revenue, expenses, and net income are carefully examined to assess the business’s profitability and sustainability. Irregular revenue patterns, inflated expense reports, or excessive owner compensation can distort the true earnings potential. Reviewing several years of income statements helps to identify trends and anomalies, which are vital for determining future earnings capacity during valuation.
-
Cash Flow Statement Interpretation
The cash flow statement tracks the movement of cash both into and out of a company, categorized into operating, investing, and financing activities. Unlike net income, cash flow provides a clearer picture of a business’s ability to generate cash. For example, a profitable business with poor cash flow management might struggle to meet its obligations, affecting its overall valuation. Analyzing cash flow from operations, capital expenditures, and debt repayments is crucial for understanding the business’s long-term financial health.
-
Forensic Accounting Investigations
In some divorce cases, one spouse may suspect that the business’s financial statements have been manipulated or falsified. Forensic accounting investigations involve a detailed examination of financial records to uncover fraud or misrepresentation. This may include tracing funds, identifying hidden assets, or reconstructing financial statements from incomplete information. The findings from a forensic accounting investigation can significantly impact the business valuation, ensuring a fairer outcome for both parties.
In conclusion, the thorough analysis and accurate interpretation of financial statements are indispensable components of an objective and equitable valuation in divorce cases. These documents provide critical insights into the business’s financial health, profitability, and cash flow, enabling experts to arrive at a justifiable and defensible valuation that fairly reflects the businesss value.
4. Expert Testimony
In matters of marital dissolution involving business assets, opinions rendered by valuation specialists are critical to the equitable division of property. These individuals, often Certified Public Accountants (CPAs) with specialized credentials in business valuation, possess the knowledge and experience necessary to analyze complex financial data and apply accepted valuation methodologies. Their expertise is crucial because the financial details of a business are frequently beyond the comprehension of the divorcing parties and the presiding judge. Consequently, the court relies on expert testimony to understand the nuances of the business’s financial health, its future earning potential, and its fair market value. For example, a valuation expert might analyze the discounted cash flow of a closely held medical practice, considering factors like patient retention, overhead costs, and industry trends. Without such testimony, the court would struggle to assign an accurate value, potentially leading to an unjust settlement.
The role of the valuation expert extends beyond simply presenting a numerical value. These professionals must clearly articulate the reasoning behind their conclusions, explaining the chosen valuation methods and justifying their assumptions. They also must withstand cross-examination by opposing counsel, who will attempt to expose weaknesses in their analysis or biases in their approach. A real-world example might involve an expert defending their choice of capitalization rate for a small manufacturing company, arguing that it accurately reflects the company’s specific risk profile and competitive environment. Furthermore, expert testimony often requires the presentation of supporting documentation, such as financial statements, industry reports, and comparable sales data, to bolster the expert’s credibility and the reliability of their conclusions.
The quality and persuasiveness of expert testimony can significantly impact the outcome of a divorce case involving business assets. Therefore, selecting a qualified and experienced valuation expert is paramount. While challenges such as conflicting expert opinions and the cost of retaining these professionals exist, their contribution is essential for ensuring fairness and transparency in the valuation process. By providing the court with unbiased and well-supported analysis, expert testimony helps to level the playing field and facilitates a more informed and equitable distribution of marital property. It underscores the importance of objectivity and precision in quantifying the economic value of a business during a divorce.
5. Asset Division
Asset division, a central aspect of divorce proceedings, directly relies on the accurate assessment of marital property. When a business interest constitutes a significant portion of the marital estate, its valuation becomes paramount to achieving an equitable distribution between the divorcing parties.
-
Determining Marital vs. Separate Property
A critical first step involves classifying the business or its portions as either marital or separate property. Marital property is generally defined as assets acquired during the marriage, while separate property includes assets owned before the marriage or received as gifts or inheritance during the marriage. The increase in value of a separate business during the marriage may also be considered marital property if the non-owning spouse contributed to its growth. This distinction significantly impacts how the businesss value is considered in the asset division process. For example, if a business was started before the marriage but substantially increased in value due to the efforts of both spouses, a portion of that increased value would likely be subject to division.
-
Equitable vs. Equal Distribution
Divorce laws vary significantly between jurisdictions regarding asset distribution. Some states adhere to community property principles, mandating an equal (50/50) division of marital assets. Others follow equitable distribution laws, requiring a fair, but not necessarily equal, division. In equitable distribution states, several factors influence the division, including the length of the marriage, the economic circumstances of each spouse, and contributions to the acquisition of marital property. Consequently, the business valuation directly influences how the court weighs these factors and determines a just allocation of assets. A higher valuation may result in the owning spouse needing to offset the non-owning spouse with other assets or make a cash payment.
-
Methods of Dividing Business Interests
Several methods exist for dividing a business interest in a divorce. One option is for one spouse to buy out the other’s share, relying on the business valuation to determine the buyout price. Another approach involves co-ownership of the business, which can be complex and often requires a detailed operating agreement. A third method is to sell the business and divide the proceeds. The choice of method depends on factors such as the liquidity of the business, the spouses’ financial resources, and their willingness to continue working together post-divorce. Regardless of the chosen method, a reliable business valuation is essential for ensuring fairness and minimizing future disputes.
-
Tax Implications of Asset Division
The division of business assets in a divorce can have significant tax consequences for both parties. Transferring ownership of a business interest may trigger capital gains taxes, while structuring the asset division as a property settlement may offer tax advantages. Understanding these tax implications is crucial for making informed decisions about asset division. For example, if one spouse receives a larger share of the business but incurs substantial capital gains taxes, the overall value of the settlement may be less than it appears. Therefore, consulting with a tax professional is highly recommended to optimize the tax outcomes of the asset division process.
These facets illustrate that business valuation and asset division are inextricably linked in divorce cases. The accuracy of the valuation directly impacts the fairness of the asset allocation, influencing both the present and future financial well-being of the divorcing parties. A thorough and objective valuation, coupled with sound legal and financial advice, is therefore essential for navigating the complexities of dividing business assets in a divorce.
6. Spousal Roles
The allocation of responsibilities and contributions during a marriage significantly influences the valuation of a business in divorce proceedings. The extent to which each spouse contributed to the business’s success, whether directly or indirectly, is a crucial factor in determining equitable distribution.
-
Direct Involvement in Business Operations
When one spouse actively participates in the daily operations of the business, their efforts directly impact its profitability and growth. This involvement can range from executive management and strategic decision-making to sales, marketing, and administrative tasks. The extent and nature of this involvement will be closely scrutinized during the valuation process. For instance, a spouse who served as the CEO and significantly expanded the business’s market share will likely be recognized for their contribution, potentially increasing the business’s overall valuation and affecting the asset division. The absence of direct involvement does not necessarily negate a spouse’s contribution, but it shifts the focus to indirect contributions.
-
Indirect Contributions to Business Success
Spousal contributions that are not directly related to the business can still play a significant role in its success. These indirect contributions might include managing the household, raising children, providing emotional support, or forgoing career opportunities to support the other spouse’s business endeavors. These efforts free up the business-owning spouse to focus on the business, indirectly contributing to its growth and profitability. Courts often recognize the value of these contributions when determining the equitable division of marital assets. For example, if a spouse sacrificed their career to manage the household and raise children, enabling the other spouse to dedicate long hours to the business, this will be considered in the valuation process and asset distribution.
-
Impact of Separate Property Contributions
If one spouse contributed separate property (assets owned before the marriage or received as gifts/inheritance) to the business, this factor will be considered during the valuation. The extent to which the separate property contributed to the business’s value will be analyzed. For example, if a spouse invested inherited funds into the business, and those funds directly led to increased revenue or asset acquisition, the contribution of separate property will be a significant factor in determining the appropriate distribution. Conversely, if the separate property had minimal impact on the business’s overall success, its influence on the valuation may be limited.
-
Compensation and Benefits Received
The compensation and benefits received by each spouse during the marriage, particularly from the business itself, are relevant to the business valuation and asset division. If one spouse received excessive compensation or benefits from the business, it may be argued that this should be factored into the valuation, potentially reducing the value attributed to the business for division purposes. For instance, if the business-owning spouse paid themselves an unusually high salary or enjoyed lavish perks, the court may view this as a form of distribution already received. Analyzing compensation packages helps provide a clearer picture of each spouse’s financial contributions and benefits derived from the business.
The examination of spousal roles provides a nuanced understanding of each party’s contribution to the business, beyond mere financial metrics. The multifaceted nature of these contributions necessitates a comprehensive evaluation during divorce proceedings to ensure a just and equitable division of assets. The specific facts and circumstances of each case will dictate the weight given to various contributions, underscoring the importance of expert testimony and legal representation in navigating these complex issues.
7. Premarital Agreements
Premarital agreements, also known as prenuptial agreements, significantly impact the valuation and division of business interests during divorce. These legally binding contracts, executed before marriage, predetermine how assets will be distributed in the event of a divorce, often addressing business ownership and valuation explicitly.
-
Defining Business Ownership and Control
Prenuptial agreements can clearly define which spouse owns a business or its portions and delineate control over its operations. This can prevent disputes about ownership rights during divorce, simplifying the valuation process. For example, a prenuptial agreement might specify that a business started before the marriage remains the sole property of one spouse, irrespective of the other spouse’s contributions during the marriage. This provision bypasses the need to determine marital versus separate property for that specific asset.
-
Establishing Valuation Methodologies
Premarital agreements can stipulate the methods to be used for valuing a business in the event of divorce, offering a pre-agreed framework that reduces ambiguity and potential conflict. The agreement might prescribe a specific valuation firm or outline the appraisal methodologies, such as discounted cash flow or market comparison, to be employed. This eliminates debates over which valuation approach is most appropriate, streamlining the process and potentially lowering the costs associated with business valuation disputes.
-
Limiting Appreciation or Growth Subject to Division
Prenuptial agreements can restrict the extent to which the appreciation or growth of a business during the marriage is subject to division. The agreement may state that only the increase in value above a certain threshold will be considered marital property. For instance, if the business was worth \$1 million at the time of marriage, the agreement might specify that only the appreciation above that amount will be divided, while the initial \$1 million remains the separate property of the owning spouse. This provision can significantly affect the final asset division and the associated valuation calculations.
-
Waivers of Interest in the Business
A prenuptial agreement may include a waiver, where one spouse explicitly relinquishes any claim to the other spouse’s business interests. This provision ensures that the business remains entirely separate property, regardless of any contributions made by the non-owning spouse during the marriage. Such a waiver eliminates the need for business valuation during divorce, as the business is excluded from the marital estate entirely. However, the enforceability of waivers depends on jurisdictional laws and the fairness of the agreement at the time of its execution.
In summary, premarital agreements serve as proactive tools to address business valuation and division in divorce, establishing clear guidelines and minimizing potential disputes. By defining ownership, specifying valuation methodologies, limiting appreciation subject to division, or waiving interests in the business altogether, these agreements provide a framework for a more predictable and less contentious divorce process when business assets are involved.
8. Tax Implications
The valuation of a business in divorce proceedings is inextricably linked to tax implications, influencing the net financial outcome for both parties. The assessed value directly impacts capital gains taxes triggered by the transfer of ownership or the sale of assets. For example, if one spouse receives the business and its appreciated value is used to offset other marital assets awarded to the other spouse, a taxable event may occur when the business is eventually sold. Understanding these consequences ensures informed decision-making regarding asset allocation and negotiation strategies. Ignoring tax implications can lead to a significantly diminished final settlement.
Structuring the division of business interests in a tax-efficient manner requires careful planning and expert advice. Options like utilizing qualified domestic relations orders (QDROs) to transfer retirement assets tax-free or strategically allocating assets to minimize capital gains are commonly employed. Furthermore, the characterization of payments as alimony or property settlements has differing tax consequences, necessitating a thorough analysis of each scenario. For instance, classifying a payment as alimony may provide a tax deduction for the payer and taxable income for the recipient, whereas a property settlement generally has no immediate tax impact. The selection of appropriate strategies depends on the specific circumstances of the divorce and the nature of the business assets involved.
In conclusion, tax implications are a crucial component of business valuation during divorce, potentially affecting the ultimate financial outcome for both spouses. A comprehensive understanding of these consequences, coupled with strategic planning and expert consultation, is essential for navigating the complexities of asset division and minimizing tax liabilities. The failure to adequately address tax considerations can undermine an otherwise equitable settlement, highlighting the need for meticulous attention to detail throughout the valuation and negotiation process.
9. Minority Discounts
The application of minority discounts in business valuation during divorce proceedings reflects the diminished value associated with a non-controlling ownership interest. This discount acknowledges that a minority shareholder lacks the power to direct corporate policy, elect directors, or control distributions, thus reducing the marketability and overall value of their shares.
-
Lack of Control and Influence
A minority owner typically lacks the ability to influence business decisions, such as executive compensation, dividend policy, or strategic direction. This absence of control can significantly depress the price a willing buyer would pay for the minority interest. For example, a spouse owning a 30% share in a closely held corporation might find that the fair market value of that interest is substantially lower than 30% of the total enterprise value due to this lack of control. The court must consider this when determining the equitable distribution of assets.
-
Reduced Marketability and Liquidity
Minority interests often suffer from reduced marketability, making them more difficult to sell. Potential buyers are less inclined to purchase an interest that offers no real control or influence over the business. This lack of liquidity further diminishes the value of the minority stake. In a divorce scenario, if the owning spouse is required to buy out the other spouse’s minority interest, this lack of marketability is a legitimate factor in determining a fair purchase price.
-
Potential for Oppression by Majority Shareholders
Minority shareholders are vulnerable to oppressive actions by majority owners, such as siphoning off profits through excessive compensation or self-dealing transactions. This risk further reduces the attractiveness of the minority interest and necessitates a discount in valuation. During divorce, this concern is particularly relevant if the spouse retaining control of the business has a history of actions that could be construed as detrimental to minority shareholder interests.
-
Quantification of the Discount
Determining the appropriate size of the minority discount is a complex process that requires the expertise of a qualified business appraiser. Factors considered include the size of the minority interest, the company’s governance structure, and the presence of any restrictions on transfer. The discount can range from 20% to 50% or more, depending on the specific circumstances. In divorce cases, both spouses may present competing appraisals, each arguing for a different discount rate, making the court’s decision on this matter a critical component of the final settlement.
The application of minority discounts in valuing a business during divorce proceedings underscores the importance of considering the specific characteristics of the ownership interest being divided. By accounting for the lack of control, reduced marketability, and potential for oppression, the valuation process aims to arrive at a fair and equitable assessment of the minority interest, preventing one spouse from being unjustly enriched or penalized.
Frequently Asked Questions
The following questions and answers address common inquiries regarding the valuation of business interests during divorce proceedings. This information aims to provide clarity on this complex topic.
Question 1: What is the primary objective of business valuation in divorce cases?
The primary objective is to determine the fair market value of a business interest for equitable distribution between divorcing parties. This valuation aims to provide an objective monetary figure that accurately reflects the business’s worth.
Question 2: What factors influence the selection of a specific valuation methodology?
The nature of the business, availability of reliable data, and applicable jurisdictional standards are key factors. Different methodologies, such as asset-based, income-based, and market-based approaches, may be more appropriate depending on these elements.
Question 3: What role do financial statements play in the valuation process?
Financial statements, including the balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement, provide the foundational data for valuation analysis. Their accuracy and completeness are crucial for deriving a reliable valuation.
Question 4: Why is expert testimony often necessary in business valuation disputes?
Valuation experts possess specialized knowledge and experience necessary to analyze complex financial data and apply valuation methodologies. Their testimony assists the court in understanding the nuances of the business and arriving at an informed decision.
Question 5: How do prenuptial agreements affect business valuation and division in divorce?
Prenuptial agreements can predetermine how business interests will be divided, potentially defining ownership, establishing valuation methodologies, or waiving interest in the business altogether, thereby significantly impacting the valuation process.
Question 6: What are minority discounts and why are they relevant in divorce cases?
Minority discounts reflect the diminished value of a non-controlling ownership interest. These discounts acknowledge the lack of control and reduced marketability associated with such interests, impacting the valuation of the specific shares being divided.
The complexities inherent in business valuation during divorce necessitate a thorough and objective approach. Consulting with qualified professionals is essential for ensuring a fair and equitable outcome.
The subsequent section will delve into potential challenges encountered during the valuation process and strategies for effectively addressing them.
Key Considerations in Business Valuation for Divorce Proceedings
Navigating the complexities requires a meticulous approach and diligent preparation. These tips offer guidance to those facing this challenging process.
Tip 1: Engage Qualified Experts Early. Selecting experienced valuation professionals and legal counsel is paramount. The expertise ensures accurate assessment and protection of interests. Delaying consultation can limit options and complicate resolution.
Tip 2: Ensure Transparent Financial Disclosure. Full and honest financial disclosure is critical. Concealing or misrepresenting financial information undermines the valuation’s integrity and can result in legal repercussions. Thorough documentation supports credibility.
Tip 3: Understand Valuation Methodologies. Familiarize with various valuation methods, such as asset-based, income-based, and market-based approaches. Comprehending the principles underlying each method enables a more informed evaluation of expert opinions.
Tip 4: Scrutinize Financial Statements. Thoroughly review financial statements for irregularities or inconsistencies. Discrepancies in revenue, expenses, or asset valuations can significantly impact the overall business valuation.
Tip 5: Address Premarital Agreements Proactively. If a premarital agreement exists, carefully analyze its provisions regarding the business. The agreement may dictate valuation methodologies or asset distribution, influencing the process substantially.
Tip 6: Consider Tax Implications. Be mindful of the tax consequences associated with asset division. Transferring business ownership or selling assets can trigger capital gains taxes. Strategic planning minimizes tax liabilities.
Tip 7: Evaluate Minority Discounts. When applicable, assess the relevance and magnitude of minority discounts. Understanding the limitations and potential for oppression associated with non-controlling interests is crucial for an equitable valuation.
Adhering to these considerations promotes a more transparent and equitable process. Diligent preparation and expert guidance ensure the best possible outcome.
The conclusion will summarize the essential aspects of business valuation, reinforcing its importance in divorce cases.
Conclusion
This exploration of business valuation in divorce cases underscores its crucial role in achieving equitable asset division. The assessment of fair market value, selection of appropriate appraisal methodologies, analysis of financial statements, reliance on expert testimony, and consideration of tax implications are vital elements in this complex process. Further, understanding the impact of premarital agreements and the potential application of minority discounts is essential for a thorough evaluation.
The intricacies involved necessitate careful consideration and professional guidance to safeguard the financial interests of all parties. The accurate and impartial assessment of a business’s worth ensures that decisions are made based on sound financial principles, promoting a more just resolution. Ongoing awareness of evolving legal and financial standards will further enhance the integrity of this critical aspect of marital dissolution.
